Issue One
The
February 2009 SSQQ
Newsletter
Issue One
Written by Rick Archer
The February 2009 SSQQ
Newsletter
Issue One
Written by Rick Archer
THE THREE-YEAR UPDATE ON THE SSQQ SLOW DANCE AND ROMANCE STORY
http://www.ssqq.com/romance/romance2009story.htm
With Valentine's Day
rapidly approaching, I am pleased to report that Slow Dance and
Romance is indeed alive and well here at SSQQ.
In 2008, we had 15 Weddings that were either be directly attributed
to SSQQ or that SSQQ played a significant role in creating. This
amazing total was actually just par for the course. Over the past 10
years, I have listed 147 Weddings that SSQQ has been involved in...
and that's just counting the ones I know about. There are plenty
more, believe me.
2009 has already brought us our first SSQQ Wedding. Former SSQQ
Dance Instructor Leo Skiba married his long-time sweetheart Rebecca
Turini in early January 2009. Leo met Rebecca in 2005 when she took
his Beginning Two Step class here at the studio. Leo promises me
plenty of details and a picture!
Furthermore, as I write, there are at least five more SSQQ weddings
right around the corner: Patty Pennington and Guy Hoover, Olga
Bochareva and Luis Castillo, Gerry Francis and Amy Adams, Keith
Patterson and Penny Gunderson, plus Gus Donnell and Fran Zandstra.
We are approaching the three year anniversary of my Matchmaker Story
about the history of the studio's legendary ability to create
positive relationships.
For those of you who are new to the studio, in 2006 the Houston
Chronicle interviewed me for an article they ran on Valentine's Day.
I had a great interview with the reporter that lasted well over an
hour, but I had mixed feelings when I saw the story in the paper. On
the one hand, it was a great compliment to see SSQQ given so much
credit for creating Romances. But at the same time I was frustrated
because so many stories I had shared with the reporter were omitted
for lack of space.
So I decided to write my own story for the SSQQ Newsletter. While I
was researching my Newsletter archives, I realized that I had never
completely written the entire story about the studio's amazing role
in creating Romance. Every time I finished one story, another story
popped into my mind. I kept typing away. One chapter followed
another. The next thing I knew, I had ended up writing a small book
on the subject. I published the eight-chapter article known as "The
Matchmaker" here on the SSQQ Web Site in March 2006.
The SSQQ Marriage Factory has been remarkably productive over the
years, but you might be surprised I never even realized just how
effective the studio was at producing Weddings until the Internet
came along. There were countless SSQQ marriages during the first
twenty years of our program, but I never thought to write them down.
That changed when the Internet came along. 1999 marked the first
full year for the SSQQ web site. Every time there was a wedding or
an engagement, I now had an easy way to post the information for
everyone to read about. From that point on, when someone like Leo
and Rebecca emailed me to report their wedding, it took about 15
seconds to add the item to the Newsletter.
Each month during 1999, I would simply add more wedding reports as
they came in (email helped a lot too; it became easy for students to
drop a quick post to me).
One evening late in 1999, I decided to review all the different
months. As I was going over the year, it dawned on me there sure
were a lot of Wedding and Engagement notices. So I started to
count...
(RICK ARCHER'S NOTE: This story is continued at
http://www.ssqq.com/romance/romance2009story.htm
..................................
WESTERN LINE DANCING CLASS WITH ANITA WILLIAMS
SUNDAY AFTERNOONS 3:30-4:30 PM. Starts Sunday, February 8.
This class will meet three Sundays in February and will cost $25 To
register, just show up.
Line Dancing as most people are well aware is a series of steps
danced in unison by a group of people in line formation. Everyone is
doing the same step at the same time. It is very popular with all
ages and can be fast or slow, set to all types of music and dance
styles. (i.e. cha-cha, waltz, east coast swing, polka, jazz)
Line Dancing has several benefits. It doesn't require a dance
partner, it promotes cardiovascular health through physical workouts
of varying intensity, it increases mobility, it creates the
opportunity for creativity and memorizing the patterns exercises
your brain.
That's the official description. The unofficial description is that
Line Dancing is Fun! It is dancing and exercise rolled into one.
Since the class is open to both Beginners and Intermediate dancers,
Anita will teach two to three dances each week, some easy, some
difficult. In addition, she will review them so you won't forget
them.
What to bring: soled shoes or tennis shoes, layered clothing, a
sense of humor.
What to expect: Expect to have a lot of fun.
Rick Archer's Note: Some classes are offered at SSQQ to pay the rent
and some classes are offered to nurture the soul. This is a class
that deserves to succeed. We have decided to skip starting it
Superbowl Sunday, but plan on joining the following Sunday, February
8 at 3:30 pm. Just show up!
BACKGROUND ON THE LINE DANCE CLASS
Anita Williams began teaching at SSQQ in 1996. Besides being an
awesome dancer, Anita is also very funny! She is teaching this class
at my request. You would be surprised how many people bug me about
Line Dancing. When Cher Longoria told me Anita had won a major line
dance contest recently, I decided to ask her what she thought.
Anita replied, "Rick, check out this
new dance
I learned at when I went to World's this year...
In response to your question, I'd love to see something like this
take off at the studio, but it's hard to get line dancing going in
Texas. If we were up north, no problem but here in Houston it's not
so popular.
I guess people think of it as a little old lady's dance, but if
people saw some of the new stuff they would be amazed. It's so much
fun. BTW did you know that 90% of the line dances are NOT country
music?"
..........
ANITA'S RESUME
SSQQ Veterans will remember that Anita competed with the SSQQ World
Champion dance team known as Heartbeat around 2001
(
http://www.ssqq.com/stories/advent35.htm
Besides Heartbeat, Anita
has also competed individually. She advanced to the professional
level in 2003 and won the UCWDC World's West Coast Swing Female
Diamond Advanced title. Anita has coached amateur students to
numerous championships including 4 World titles and one National
title.
Anita currently competes in line dance at the advanced and Showcase
level. She recently placed 2nd overall at UCWDC World's in Advanced
Classic line dance and 3rd in Showcase Line Dance competition. When
Anita is not competing, she teaches line dance at various dance
events all over the country. ..................
UPDATE ON CONQUEST 2009, OUR SUMMER DANCE CRUISE
http://www.ssqq.com/travel/conquest2009.htm
Welcome aboard to seven new passengers!
Jack Myers
Jo Wilson
Keith Baker
Betty Baker
Gene Garner
Charlie Denton
Rowena Roche
----- Original Message -----
From: e
To: marla@ssqq.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 9:23 AM
Subject: Carribean Cruise in August - Questions
Marla,
Hi, I have been reading about the SSQQ trips for years now in the
newsletter. I'm finally in a position in my life to consider going.
I do have some questions, though.
If you don't have a roommate do you collect names of those who are
looking for people to share with and match them up (sort of potluck
like at camp)? If there is an odd number I guess that person will
need to pay a single room rate? Does that even exist or is it double
the price? I've never been on a cruise so I don't know how that all
works.
In the past what has been the mix of people? Are they mainly
couples? Are there lots of single women and men or has it been
mainly couples and a few singles? Of course I'm concerned that it
will be heavy with single women on the dancing nights.
From: Marla
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:26 PM
To: e
Subject: Re: Carribean Cruise in August - Questions
Hello Elizabeth,
1. I match up roommates based on the cabin type selected and then
the passenger's age.
Yes, it is like potluck. Most times it works; once in a while you
roll your eyes. One hint: If the registration form is turned in
prior to the deadline, we will do our best to find a roommate
scientifically.
last minute signups can't be choosy. Single occupancy is always an
option.
2. The Caribbean cruise mix is usually 60% singles/40% couples. The
ratio of men to women is usually 40%men/ 60% women. Whether you
dance or not is pretty much up to you. If you wait for someone to
ask you, you will sit for awhile. Feel free to ask people to dance..
.
The best thing to do is to take some group dance classes prior to
the cruise and get to know everybody.
All I can tell you is that I was new to the studio in 2001 and
signed up for the cruise. The boy/girl ratio and the married to
single ratio was not any different then. I met my future husband on
the cruise. I am not saying that this will happen to you, but life
is what you wish to make of it.
I hope you will join us,
.......................
UPDATE ON OUR BARCELONA 2009 TRIP
http://www.ssqq.com/travel/barcelona2009.htm
From: Marla Archer
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 4:47 PM
To: dance@ssqq.com
Subject: Barcelona
Hello Everybody,
We are currently up to 37 passengers who are headed to the world's
most favorite Western Mediterranean cruise destinations.
If you have been sitting on the fence, it is now time to sign up for
the cruise! Don't miss out on sharing so many adventures with all
your friends in the world's most favorite vacation destination.
A $250 deposit will hold your spot on the trip all the way until
final payment on July 15th, 2009. That is right, you have six months
to save for this fabulous cruise!
Royal Caribbean has given me a few more days to hold on to my
reserved group space. We have until Wednesday, January 28th to add
anyone to the group. On Thursday, January 29th I can still add
people to our group, however it will be at the prevailing rate.
Group Pricing is as follows:
Inside Category N -- $896 per person cruise only
Oceanview Category I -- $1136 per person cruise only
Balcony Category E1 -- $1446 per person cruise only
All prices are double occupancy.
You will be pleased to know that this trip has become less
expensive. For one thing, the fuel surcharge is gone. In addition,
the room prices have dropped $170 for the Inside Cabins, $220 for
Oceanview, and $60 less for Balconies. Also encouraging is the Euro
to Dollar ratio has improved dramatically in our favor since last
year's trip. Air fare has dropped considerably as well. This trip
will never be inexpensive, but at least it is becoming more of a
bargain.
I hope you will decide to join us for another trip of a lifetime!
Don't miss out on this wonderful experience!!!
You may email or fax me the information or simply hand the form to
Rick or me at the studio.
http://www.ssqq.com/travel/barcelona2009registration.htm
....................
ARGENTINE TANGO: SONJA AND NOE SHOW OFF!
Sonja Strathearn and Noe Rosas received a well-deserved round of
applause for their performance at the recent SSQQ Salsa-Tango Party.
Sonja and Noe have been working hard to bring Argentine Tango here
to SSQQ and their work seems to be paying off. In January, their
Beginning Argentine Tango class on Tuesday had 30 people in it.
I was so curious about the dance that I took Noe and Sonja's Crash
Course on the same night as their performance. I was pleasantly
surprised. Unlike a previous Argentine class that left me confused
and unimpressed, the style that Sonja and Noe teach is easy to
understand and very attractive.
I predict that as our two teachers gain experience, we will develop
an impressive Argentine Tango program here at the studio.
By the way, I'm not positive, but I believe Noe and Sonja intend to
perform again at the February 21 Salsa Explosion Party.
http://www.ssqq.com/ssqq/party04salsa.htm
In the meantime, you can see them perform now because Sonja
forwarded me a link to a video of their January performance!
January 17, 2009 -
Tango Performance - Noe and Sonja
RACE RELATIONS IN AMERICA
In the previous Newsletter, I wrote a lengthy article about Race
Relations in America. It was my position that Race Relations have
improved dramatically over the years and especially since the Obama
Presidential Campaign.
By and large, my article was met by the deafening roar of silence.
However I did receive one comment which I will share with you.
-----Original Message-----
From: G
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:26 PM
To: ssqqnewsletter@ssqq.com
Subject: Re: January 2009 SSQQ Newsletter Issue Four
Rick,
Food for thought on your comments about the new president etc. and
how good it will be for our country.
What about when the mix of students at your studio goes from one
black to 2, to a group, to a big unruly group to the point us old
whites go elsewhere?
I bet if you start getting them (Blacks) as a big customer base and
then it may not seem so cool.
I am neutral and like it when your newsletter is too. Don't lean to
black too quick.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Archer
To: g
Sent: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:49 am
Subject: race relations January 2009 SSQQ Newsletter Issue Four
Our Salsa crowd is 70% Hispanic. Salsa dancing continues to be our
strongest dance program. Personally, I am thoroughly grateful for
their continued support of my program. Even though I don't have a
clue about Salsa Dancing, this group of people has always been warm
to me when I drop by to visit.
Many of these Hispanic people do not have Internet, do not speak
English well, have much education, or have deep roots in the Houston
community. Some of these people have to dig deep just to come up
with $40 or $50 for tuition. Nevertheless, when they are here at the
studio, they come here to laugh, smile, dance, have fun, and see
their friends.
Furthermore despite the fact that the studio is incredibly crowded
on Salsa Nights, there is a high degree of harmony and friendship.
This group gives us no trouble whatsoever.
Let me add that I personally was shocked at the level of rude
behavior on our August dance cruise in 2008. At least seven
different people behaved in ways that made me deeply uncomfortable.
If you don't believe me, I have documented their actions thoroughly.
http://www.ssqq.com/travel/conquest2008story01.htm
I didn't post their pictures, but let me now point out that every
one of these people were white. In addition these seven were
affluent, well-educated, and very privileged.
There are good people and bad people of every race.
Our country will never achieve its full potential until we stop
looking at the color of people's skin.
................
PLUMBER FINDS RING IN TOILET
By AMANDA LEE MYERS
Associated Press o January 24, 2009
It took a plumber to retrieve a woman's 7-carat diamond ring after
city workers failed in efforts to flush the gem out of the pipes of
a restaurant toilet.
The $70,000 wedding ring fell from Allison Berry's hand when she
flushed the toilet in the restroom of the Black Bear Diner on Jan.
14, the plumber said. The ring plopped in and the water whisked it
away, said Elena Castelar, the restaurant's shift manager.
Berry and her fiancé first called a plumber. This man told them it
was a lost cause. Their next step was to contact the city of
Phoenix. City workers opened up a pipe outside of the restaurant,
and then flushed the toilet repeatedly, hoping that the engagement
ring would be forced out. But the diamond ring was stuck.
City workers opened a pipe outside the restaurant and continuously
flushed the toilet, hoping to push the ring out to the opening. When
that didn't work, the city called the office in suburban Tempe of
Mr. Rooter, a plumbing services franchise based in Waco, Texas.
"This is going to be like dredging for a treasure chest in the
ocean," Mike Roberts, general manager of Mr. Rooter, said at the
time.
Using a long rod, Roberts guided a tiny video camera into the pipe
with an infrared light attached. After several hours of searching,
he eventually spotted the ring just 3 feet down and 5 feet over from
where it was flushed.
Then it took an hour-and-a-half of jackhammering and pipe removal
before Roberts and a technician could recover the ring, eight hours
after it fell in the toilet.
"They always say diamonds are a girl's best friend. In this case, a
plumber is a girl's best friend," Roberts said. "She was just so
excited, she had tears in her eyes. She gave us a hug and said
'Thank you so much.'"
The Mr. Rooter bill came to $5,200 and the city's bill was $1,000.
Berry, of Eureka, Calif., and her husband also tipped Roberts and
the technician $400 each and gave $200 to a diner employee for
staying late.
...............
COMPLAINT OF THE MONTH:
THE DAUGHTER OF DYNAMIC GRAPHICS FOUNDER DEFENDS HER FATHER'S MEMORY
AGAINST RICK ARCHER'S GARBAGE ARTICLE
Rick Archer's Note: Many of you have complimented me over the years
over the unusual artwork displayed on the SSQQ Dance Studio walls.
This artwork was created by an anonymous man who worked for Dynamic
Graphics, a commercial graphic arts service.
I have been subscribing to this service since 1984. Now you know
where I get the magnificent artwork you see on the SSQQ web site.
Over the years, I have had two major issues with this company. One,
they refuse to disclose the identity of the artist. I admire his
work so much and I long to pay him homage, but it doesn't look like
I will ever get my chance thanks to the paranoid attitude of this
company.
Even more irritating is the company's insistence on charging me
money to buy photographs from them. When I became a member of the
art service, for twenty years I received a steady supply of
wonderful graphics. Then some moron decided to find a way to get the
customers to pay for photographs.
To make a long story short, they decided to force their customers to
pay for the photographs if they wanted to continue to get the
artwork too. I deeply resented their position. So I wrote an article
on my web site addressing my concerns.
http://www.ssqq.com/stories/advent44.htm
This article has never generated much interest. At the present, my
article about Dynamic Graphics is positioned at 102 on Google if you
type in 'Dynamic Graphics'.
However, one woman discovered my article and had an absolute hissy
fit.
From: kmmyb
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:12 PM
To: dance@ssqq.com
Subject: Dynamic Graphics
I came across you letter on the internet regarding Dynamic Graphics.
My father started this company in 1964 after his father started
Multi-ad services in 1945. He was thrown out by his employees in
1962 and being despondent committed suicide. My father sued and won
and started Dynamic Graphics. If you knew the history and my father
and his dedication and the background, you would be more
appreciative. Kim Bryan
From: Rick Archer
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:55 PM
To: 'kmmyb'
Subject: RE: Dynamic Graphics
Why would my "lack of appreciation" for Dynamic Graphics in any way
be affected by your father's story?
The point of my story is that the company has made terrible
decisions by forcing unwanted photographs down our throats and
eliminating their top artists.
What does any of my problem have to do with your family's history? I
doubt seriously that your father had anything to do with what I am
upset about.
From: kim bryan
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:50 PM
To: 'Rick Archer'
Subject: RE: Dynamic Graphics
This company was my father's vision and his life. He died in 1992
and if you had known him you would not desecrate his life and what
he did. You know nothing about Dynamic Graphics. You have 1 tiny
experience that you put all over the internet about a company my
father created. He did not even know about the internet. He created
a company out of a legacy his father left. I lived it. I felt it.
Your experience in regards to this company is so small in compared
to mine or all the employees who came to his funeral telling me how
they loved him and what he did for them. Even I was in awe of what
they had to say. He took care of everyone he employed and they loved
him. You have some selfish little experience and you can not see
farther than that. Everyone and everything has a story and those who
are so arrogant to think their story is the only one and the
defining one are living in selfishness. The history behind this
company is so huge and compelling yet you have some stupid small
experience about an artist and by the way, an artist that received
exposure due to what my father created, that I call this arrogance.
Every artist he bought artwork from was very thankful and caring and
loyal to him. He was a creative person with a vision for his time. I
miss him every day and the Dynamic Graphics emblem is on his crypt.
You, I have no use for.
From: Rick Archer
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:21 AM
To: 'kim bryan'
Subject: RE: Dynamic Graphics
"You, I have no use for."
Ms. Bryan, if you have actually read my article, you will note that
I have paid out at least $1,000 a year to Dynamic Graphics... now
Jupiter Images... since 1984. At one point I had double
subscriptions as well for about fifteen years. Not only have I been
a loyal customer of your father's 'vision' for 25 years, by my
estimate, I have paid out well over $50,000 in subscription fees.
Even at today's inflated prices, I could buy a luxury car for those
kind of numbers.
It is people like me that keep DG and JI in business. Most business
people would be appreciative of customers like me, but you seem to
be the peculiar exception.
You disrespect me because I had the nerve to protest the company's
business decision to force unwanted photographs down my throat? In
your mind, I am 'arrogant', 'selfish', 'tiny'. And I have somehow
insulted a man I have never even heard of. Interesting. I totally
reject your narrow-minded position.
As a review of my position, I originally came to your father's
company to buy commercial artwork. I never signed up to purchase
photography. My camera allows me to take any picture I want.
It seems to me that Dynamic Graphics has drifted terribly from your
father's vision. I wrote an article on the Internet to share my
attitude because the company's representatives basically said
'Tough. Take it or leave it'. I decided to continue my subscription,
but I resented it then and continue to resent the company's policy.
I assume you acknowledge I have the right to share my complaint
about Dynamic Graphics.
And now you have the nerve to call me 'selfish' for protesting the
company's policy to shove these unwanted photos down the customer's
throat.
Furthermore, how you manage to take offense at my legitimate right
to protest and link my words in some way as being disrespectful to
your deceased father's memory is quite a stretch.
Now that you have had your fun insulting me, maybe you could do me a
favor and tell me the name of the artist whose work I admire so
much.
From: kim bryan
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:26 PM
To: 'Rick Archer'
Subject: RE: Dynamic Graphics
If I had it I would tell you, because my father only bought art and
hired artists he admired and thought could have value to the
company. My father founded this company in 1964 after a law suit
with Multi-Ad services that broke him and my family. Then he built
this company from the ground up. When he got cancer he did not want
his employees to be without jobs so he sold it to them before his
death. Wish I could help you, but I can't. I just know that the what
my father accomplished and created out of nothing you could not do.
You can only use the internet to air your complaints in a very small
fashion.
From: Rick Archer
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:45 PM
To: 'kim bryan'
Subject: RE: Dynamic Graphics
"I just know that the what my father accomplished and created out of
nothing you could not do."
I am amused to note that you have just insulted me yet again. This
is quite an ability you have.
I have created the largest dance studio in the United States of
America out of nothing. This has been my life's work for the past
thirty years. I might add the wonderful artwork from your father's
company has been instrumental in helping me build the studio's
success during this time.
Besides teaching 1300 people to dance every month, my studio has
created 150 marriages in the past ten years alone.
But then I guess in your set of values building a dance studio from
the ground up doesn't begin to compare to creating an art service.
From: kim bryan
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 2:19 PM
To: 'Rick Archer'
Subject: RE: Dynamic Graphics
If what you say is true then I do appreciate someone who has created
something out of nothing. Maybe you can then understand that my
father's legacy is not just an "art service" just as yours is not
just a "dance studio". I do not believe I am the one insulting. I
did not write garbage on the internet about your dance studio. You
should be proud of what you have created. Just as I am proud of what
my father accomplished. Yes no one is insulting you. You are
insulting me. Do you have someone who will be left to appreciate
what you have done? I am left to do so for my father. He died an
untimely death still working to the end to provide for his
employees.
Kim Bartel, Daughter of the founder of Dynamic Graphics
A company with a legacy of caring for its employees. A company my
father dedicated his life to so that his father's life would not be
in vain.
From: Rick Archer
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 2:58 PM
To: 'kim bryan'
Subject: RE: Dynamic Graphics
"I do not believe I am the one insulting."
"I did not write garbage..."
There you go again. Like I said, Ms. Bryan, you have a definite
knack for insulting. You just implied that what I wrote about
Dynamic Graphics was 'garbage'. Not the most pleasant metaphor.
I understand a daughter who wishes to honor her father's memory, but
tilting at windmills a la Don Quixote is not the right way to go
about it.
A quick review of my article will reveal I have never once said
anything derogatory about your father. And if you think my quibble
about the photography issue is some sort of indirect poke at your
father, then you obviously have a very thin skin.
From: kim bryan
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 7:19 PM
To: 'Rick Archer'
Subject: RE: Dynamic Graphics
Go Dance Away
...............
AND THAT'S A WRAP FOR FEBRUARY 2009 ISSUE 1. THANKS FOR READING!
|
Issue
Two
The
February 2009 SSQQ Newsletter Issue Two
Written by Rick Archer
THE NEW FEBRUARY SSQQ DANCE SCHEDULE BEGINS SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 1
http://www.ssqq.com/ssqq/schedule.htm
Students are always
welcome to start class in the Second Week of the Dance Semester.
In particular, we could use more men in my Intermediate Western
Waltz class. Although there are 35 people signed up, we had six
extra ladies last week while you manly brutes were busy watching the
Super Bowl Pregame show.
For you men who haven't gotten the memo, Waltz more than any other
dance seems to affect women emotionally. If the fastest way to a
man's heart is through his stomach, a woman's heart is especially
available through a Waltz.
If you don't believe me, I once wrote a very interesting story about
this phenomenon.
To read about the Waltz Kings, visit
http://www.ssqq.com/stories/advice1.htm
By the way, we also need extra ladies in Martian Whip Technique on
Sundays/Mondays 7 pm.
...............
DANCE PARTIES IN FEBRUARY:
THE RED AND WHITE VALENTINES SWING PARTY
http://www.ssqq.com/ssqq/party3.htm
Saturday, February 14, 9 - 11:30 pm
Crash Courses 7-9 PM
(to register for a class, just show up around 6:45 pm)
CINDERELLA'S WALTZ (ADVANCED PATTERNS) - Rick
SLOW DANCING - Marla (couples only)
RUMBA - The Latin Dance of Romance - Jill
PUTTIN' ON THE RITZ: BEGINNING SWING - Becky
VALENTINE'S DAY SWING PATTERNS (ADVANCED PATTERNS) - Maureen
SINATRA FOXTROT - Jack
About the Party: There will be mostly Swing music (both East and
West Coast) played at this party. In addition, as a nod to the
Romantic nature of the evening, expect many Waltzes and some Sinatra
Foxtrots as well. And I will take song requests as well.
In addition, if I hear ONE MORE 'SINGLE' PERSON tell me they aren't
coming because it will only be couples, I will beat them with a
pillow. That is a promise.
This is a dance party. At SSQQ, everyone dances with everyone. For
example, I am happily married, but I promise you that Marla and I do
not want to dance exclusively with each other all night long.
Married people like to dance with single people too! We are all
friends, remember?
You single people need to quit acting like refugees from a leper
colony. Singles will not be 'singled out', I assure you. In
addition, we will do some John-Paul-Jones dances and partner
switching dances so that everyone participates.
THE SSQQ SALSA EXPLOSION DANCE PARTY THIS WEEKEND!
http://www.ssqq.com/ssqq/party04salsa.htm
Saturday, February 21, 9 - Midnight
CRASH COURSES 7-9 PM
(To register, just show at 6:45 and pay at the door)
DIRTY SALSA - Dakota
BEG BACHATA - Linda
BEG SALSA - Angela and Morris
SALSA DIPS AND LUNGES - Noe
BEGINNING CUMBIA - Steve
INTERMEDIATE SALSA PTNS - Ulyses and Shelli
There will be a Salsa dance demonstration during the party plus
Sonja and Noe will demonstrate Argentine Tango again.
.................................
STEVE GABINO, MASTER PHOTOGRAPHER
http://www.ssqq.com/halloween/stevegabino.htm
This issue of the SSQQ
Newsletter features our annual review of the Best Costume Contest
from the 2008 Party.
If the first thought that crosses your mind is that we are closer to
the 2009 Party than we are to the 2008 Party, then that shows you
what a small, narrow-minded person you are. I deliberately take my
sweet time working on these important decisions so that each choice
is PERFECT. But that's our next story.
Right now I wish to honor Steve Gabino, the man who takes those
wonderful Halloween Party pictures for us! Not only is Steve one of
the most popular SSQQ instructors, he is very kind to share his
immense talents with us at Halloween time.
Recently I discovered that Steve is available as a freelance
photographer. Considering how many couples get married through SSQQ,
Steve went out and bought a camera hoping to catch some Wedding
Business on the side. What a clever idea! And it worked too!
Actually I am kidding a little.
Steve has been honing his photography skills on a near-daily basis
ever since digital cameras came along. I think it is great that
Steve is able to parlay a hobby into a side business. I did the same
thing with 'dancing' about 34 years ago and it worked out pretty
well for me.
Maybe we will see a "Great Gabino Photography Shop" one of these
days!
If you would like to learn more about Steve and his photography
skills, please visit:
http://www.ssqq.com/halloween/stevegabino.htm
..............
Halloween Best Costumes 2008
(Suggestion: Before you
read this story, you should click the link above to open up the SSQQ
Best Costume page. This will allow you to follow the story and be
able to reference the pictures more easily. You will notice I refer
to other years on a frequent basis. There are links at the bottom of
all pages that allow you to time travel to the various years fairly
easily.)
The SSQQ Halloween Party is famous for several reasons. One, our
Party has a well-deserved reputation for wonderful costumes. The
costumes range from the beautiful to the macabre, from sexy to
funny, plus there are always several costumes that are so creative
and original we can't help but applaud!
Our Halloween Party is also famous for exasperation because Rick
Archer is ridiculously slow at publishing the pictures. As you can
see, this year is no exception. Some things never change.
Oh, quit your quibbling. Better late than never! Besides, it's free.
We have already read about Steve Gabino and his marvelous
photography work. So now let's go see who won what and start
belly-aching about the people who shoulda been the winners but got
ignored instead.
TOP 10 COSTUMES FROM THE 2008 HALLOWEEN PARTY.
As you can see, this year's headliners are the Big Bad Wolves. Now
we have had Big Bad Wolf winners before (eg, 1999 Best Costumes,
2000 Best Costumes), but these were exceptionally Good Big Bad Wolf
costumes. In fact, they were pure Clint Eastwood: Good, Bad, and
Ugly.
1 - Stan Romney and his lovely friend Debbie came as the Big Bad
Wolf and Little Riding Hood.
Stan and Debbie have been regular winners in our "Best Costume"
contest for several years. They were Runner-Up stars in 2005 as
Popeye and Olive Oyl. They took Runner-Up honors again in 2006 with
some sharp Roaring 20s Speakeasy costumes. Last year 2007 they hit
the Top Ten as Gepetto and Pinocchio. Wonderful costumes for four
years running! My hat is off to this couple for their continued
excellence. Oddly enough, I don't think they have ever taken a dance
class here. That alone shows they won because they are the only
people who have never complained about a thing.
2 - When it comes to "Big Bad Wolf", we had some guy who was very
impressive.
What big teeth he has! Sorry, I don't know who he is, but he looks
mean enough to take out Wolverine from X-Men. I looked through the
other 2008 pictures to see if he took off his mask, but didn't catch
any useful glimpse. Maybe someone can help me out with his identity!
3 - Who are these scary people? Or, to paraphrase the Lone Ranger,
"Who are those masked men?"
For two straight years, there has been a very scary couple that has
REFUSED to take their masks off. This presents a real problem for
me. You see, many people who come to the SSQQ party worry about
people who don't take off their masks.
To them, this goes straight to their deepest fears that REAL
MONSTERS DO ATTEND THIS PARTY. I refuse to confirm or deny this
allegation other than to say it is a distinct possibility. Let me
add this is a subject I prefer not to write too much about for fear
that it might affect attendance. There have been mysterious
disappearances over the years. People come to the Party and then we
never see them again. I just tell them they met someone cute and
have better things to do than dance, but deep down I admit I wonder
myself.
That said, I openly admit this particular 2008 Monster couple
(Chucky and the Spike-haired Alien Babe) are flesh and blood human
beings. But other people didn't know this. Chucky and Spike
certainly did frighten a lot of people at this year's party. I got a
lot of complaints!
Nor is this the first time guests have complained to me about this
same couple! It happened last year too. I let Chuck and Spike get
away with it last year, but I am telling you, they will hurt future
attendance if I don't say something right now. That explains why I
have decided to take matters into my own hands and unmask My
Favorite Monsters. Their names are Bob and Ana!
For two straight years, Bob Graham and Ana Torres have remained
hidden from the world inside their marvelous Monster costumes.
That's right - Bob and Ana are the Monsters! You people are scared
to death of two of the nicest people at the studio!
Personally speaking, although Bob and Ana are so scary they cause me
headaches, I have to begrudgingly admit I admire their endurance.
Some of you know exactly what I am talking about when I say it gets
REALLY HOT inside those costumes, especially after you dance a
little. Most people at least take off their masks for a breath of
fresh air. Not Bob and Ana! They keep those hideous rubber masks on
the entire night. Those masks are hot, they are uncomfortable, they
limit your vision, they itch, and worst of all they make you feel
very claustrophobic. These two have to be miserable inside those
outfits!
And they suffer for what reason? So people can complain about how
ugly and scary they are? Whoa, now that's a big reward! Such a
payoff!
Personally, I am glad they suffer. After you read about their rotten
behavior, you will all agree they deserve an entire night of
Punishment.
Actually Chuck and Spike perform a huge public service at the party.
How would my party ever be successful without some big, ugly
monsters? I mean, think about it. A lot of people come to this
studio looking stunning, sexy, colorful, and beautiful. They breathe
fresh air all night long. And with ugly monsters standing around,
the Beautiful People look even more beautiful! All the Beautiful
People owe a great debt to Ugly People for providing such an obvious
contrast!
So I think Bob and Ana deserve a Prize for their Service to the
Beautiful People. Bob and Ana get my 2008 Ugly Costume Hero award
for this year and for last year as well. Without their suffering,
how could we appreciate true beauty?
Actually, it is kind of ironic that Ana Torres of all people gets
"The Big Ugly" Award. What the world doesn't realize is that inside
her Monster Costume lurks the face of a real beauty! When it comes
to 'inner beauty', someone surely had Ana in mind. That's right, Ana
Torres is not only one of the sweetest ladies I know, she is
knockout pretty!
In my book, a woman this beautiful who spends an entire evening
looking gruesome and repulsive two years in a row marks her as one
heck of a neat girl! So when you see me hugging her as I am wont to
do every time I see her, now you know why I think Ana is so special!
And while I am giving out compliments, Bob is definitely one of the
nicest guys I know as well. He and Ana fit like a glove with their
smiles and warmth.
You might be surprised to learn that despite the fact that I really
both people, Bob and Ana are in BIG TROUBLE with me.
One week ago on Wednesday, January 28, these two characters showed
up for my Ghost Town class wearing Matching Green outfits. Now,
here's the deal. It is obvious the two have a lot of affection for
each other. I don't have a problem with that. But when they wear
Matching Color-Coordinated Outfits, they cross a line. People who
are lonely see how happy they are and how obnoxiously cute they look
together and they get envious. That's right - Bob and Ana are guilty
of flaunting their happiness in front of an entire class (secretly,
I think they are getting back at all of us for not appreciating them
enough when they are ugly.)
So last week I gave them a warning - no more cute color-coordinated
outfits! Knock it off.
Imagine my consternation when they wore the exact same obnoxious
matching green outfits to the studio on Monday, February 2. The
nerve! So I chewed them out again! They deserved to be chewed out!
Excessive cuteness is a serious fashion crime at SSQQ.
I figured two warnings should do it. You would thing a word to the
wise should be sufficient. Wrong! On Wednesday, February 3, Bob and
Ana were in my Ghost Town class. It was a big night. There were over
200 people at the studio that night! 50 of them were in my class.
Fifty people is a lot of people to keep track of. So I was a little
preoccupied.
But then it happened. Twenty minutes into class Bob and Ana made a
big mistake - they stood next to each other. When I saw them wearing
color-coordinated Burgundy outfits, I nearly went ballistic. The
nerve!!! It didn't matter that they both turned Barney-purple with
embarrassment. That ain't gonna get them off the hook. They were TOO
CUTE!! Shame on both of them!
You know, Once is an incident. And Twice is a coincidence. But THREE
TIMES IS DELIBERATE! They are both guilty of deliberately being TOO
CUTE! This burgundy incident was no accident. Trust me. I have been
around too long. I know when people are being deliberately
color-coordinated because I am an expert. I am telling you they did
it ON PURPOSE as a shameful attention-getting device!
And I told Bob and Ana I was going to teach them a lesson and write
them up in the newsletter. Do not feel sorry for them. Do not try to
make them feel better. They are getting what they deserve! This
unacceptable behavior is tantamount to publicly sticking their
tongue out at me! Tsk Tsk!
So let this be a warning to Bob and Ana and any other
color-coordinated couples that this kind of behavior will not be
tolerated at the studio. Knock it off! From now on, cute couples
must wear un-matching outfits or expect to be publicly called out.
It is hard enough to be lonely and see a couple together that is so
obviously happy together. But when they start dress alike, that is
TOO MUCH. And I have to tell you, everyone in that room agreed with
me. Bob and Ana had gone too far. They were TOO CUTE FOR WORDS!
Shame on them. Next time I think I will spank them.
Furthermore they better not come to the 2009 Halloween Party wearing
matching outfits. That will be the absolute last straw.
4 - Mara Rivas and Bruce Hanka won as Pirates for the second year in
a row. Except this year they wore a different Pirate costume than
last year. Mind you, their costumes were wonderful, but I would have
never expected Halloween Party veterans like Bruce and Mara to make
a Style Mistake of this magnitude!
So I asked Bruce why "Pirates" two years in a row. He replied,
"Rick, you have people who come as Monsters two years in a row and
you go gagagoogoo about how great they are. Why can't we be Pirates
twice in a row? After all, Mara and I make great Pirates! This Best
Costume stuff is a cutthroat business and no one is more cutthroat
than we are."
Who can argue with that kind of logic?
5 - Sol Eisenbaum and Leanne Parkinson were just too cute as the
Marx Brothers. Did you check out Sol's Cigar and Wink? By the way, I
am too much of a gentleman to comment on Lee Ann's big grin.
Sol and Lee Ann are working on their own costume legacy. They were
on last year's Runner-Up page as Good and Evil.
6 - Leslie and Nick Tenaro are certainly no strangers to the
Winner's Circle. This year they came as Adam and Eve in the Garden
of Eden. Leslie gets extra credit for creating these costumes
herself!
Leslie never lets me forget she how she once got 'business' from her
Halloween Costume ability. In 2005, she and Nick made it to the Top
Ten for the first time. They were awesome as a "Plug" and a
"Socket". You have to go check out the picture! Leslie had the
biggest grin in her picture (similar to Lee Ann's grin this year).
You really have to hand it to Nick for being such a good sport and
wearing that outfit. It was definitely a shocking sight to see!
When Leslie isn't winning Ballroom Contests and Costume Contests,
she is a dermatologist. When a prospective client was Googling to
find a Houston dermatologist, he (she?) was so taken with the sense
of humor behind the 2005 costume that Leslie got a new client.
Nick and Leslie made Runnerup in 2006 as Zorro and his lovely
Spanish Senorita.
Unfortunately they missed the 2007 Party when Nick unexpectedly had
to leave town on a business emergency. Leslie was so disappointed
she could barely see straight! She had her Adam and Eve costume
ready to roll, but alas, she had to wait an entire year for its
debut. And what a clever costume it is! Well worth the wait.
7 - Nick Aghazarian and Barbara Smith are newcomers to our Best
Costume Circle. They were pretty wonderful. Nick was a rock star and
Barbara, well, I'm not sure what Barbara was. There was a football
hanging down (football fan?), but then there were the dollar bills
as well. Maybe Barbara was a betting on football. Who knows? Maybe
Barbara will write and explain her outfit to me.
My favorite story on confusing costumes goes all the way back to
1999. This was the year that Rocky Kneten came as a Mexican Folk
monster known as "Chupacabra". Rocky never spoke a single word the
entire night at the party. But he talked his girlfriend Laura Wild
into coming as his costume interpreter. Laura came in a business
outfit complete with pad and pencil and explanatory leaflets to be
Rocky's "Official Spokesperson". She said she was trying to line up
media appearances as well. Throughout the night Laura patiently
explained his costume and his legend to anyone who asked. Meanwhile
Rocky Chupacabra simply smiled for the cameras. I loved it!
Sorry to say, I briefly listened in once, but I didn't understand a
thing Laura said. At the time, I thought her story was so weird it
had to be made up. I thought this bizarre story was part of the
joke.
It wasn't until 2007 that I actually saw a story on National
Geographic that explained all about "Chupacabra". I was stunned to
realize this thing really exists! So that's what Rocky and Laura had
been up to! I grinned all the way through the N.G. show! What an
imagination.
So maybe Barbara needs to hire a Costume Spokesperson for her next
Halloween Costume! How about it, Nick?
8 - Joe Kintz and Bonnie Adams certainly had two of the most
beautiful costumes this year. I am not sure they are "Renaissance"
characters or someone out of "Heidi", but either way I thought they
were wonderful.
And let me add that the unsung heroes here are that naughty couple
Bob and Ana, My Favorite Monsters. As I said earlier, without ugly
monsters running around the party, how would we ever appreciate just
how beautiful Joe and Bonnie were on this night?
9 - Speaking of wonderful, Tresa Frazier came as Pine-o-Fresh Car
Freshener. Now that costume was creative! I think her outfit got my
biggest grin of the night, especially since she seemed to be
enjoying herself so much. People's noses certainly perked up
whenever she passed them by!
I think Tresa made this outfit herself. Isn't she a hoot!?
10 - Hats off to Jess and Pat Carnes for their "Hula Girl and the
Sailor". Did you notice that 6' 8" Jess was the Hula Girl? Words do
not totally describe the wonder of a 6' 8" man in a grass skirt.
That guy has guts! Those long legs took a lot of grass to cover. I
didn't even know grass grew that long.
And wasn't that a pretty cute sailor Jess came with?
I think my only regret of the entire party was that Jess did not get
his picture taken with two very pretty girls who also wore grass
skirts and Hawaiian leis. Now that would have been a picture to
rival all the Sarah Palins!
11 - Finally we get to our Bad Boy and Bad Girl. Joel Konkel and
Lori Hill came as the Devil and the Devil's consort. I heard they
had a hell of a good time at the party.
Personally, I would never dream of wearing an outfit that might
irritate the Devil, but Lori and Joel decided to throw caution to
the winds and wear their taboo outfits. More power to them. You have
to admire people who aren't superstitious. They better not get
caught dead wearing those outfits in case they are heading
downstairs. Or hope the D-Man has a sense of humor. "Gee, Mr. D, we
are your biggest fans!"
12 - Now I am well aware that a Top Ten Best Costume List should
stop some around "Ten", but I make the rules. If I want to post 12
Winners for 10 spots, that makes perfect sense to me. Besides, how
can I possibly overlook giving an award to a 6' 2" man in drag with
beautiful long legs, a winning smile, and a pretty face?
This party marks the second time that Karl Rorabacher has come to
the SSQQ Halloween Party dressed as a woman.
Karl was quite a hit back at the 1999 party as well. He was younger
then and (dare I say it?) rather "shapely" as well. Personally, I
thought Karl was much prettier than his girlfriend that night,
although I didn't bother sharing that opinion at the time. It
bothered me that I couldn't take my eyes off of Karl!
Karl was so good-looking as a woman that he was kind of scary. In
fact, Karl was even better looking than Cher Longoria that night.
What I neglected to mention was that I wasn't the only guy who
couldn't take his eyes off the tall lady in black. Karl was so
attractive in drag that several unsuspecting men accidentally asked
him to dance. I am telling you, Karl had some serious Curves! And
who can forget that beautiful face? From a distance, Karl was
definitely a Babe!
Once the men got close enough to pop the question, they were more
than slightly freaked out that to see that Lola, er Karl that is,
was really a guy. Karl definitely freaked out the entire place.
There were some great costumes at the 1999 Party, but Karl was the
hands-down hit of the night.
For this year's "Lola" reappearance, Karl seems to have toned it
down a bit.
Comparing his 1999 picture to 2008, I noticed that Karl may have
thickened a bit in the waist. I guess he has said goodbye to his
girlish figure. I think wearing the two-piece that showed off his
"masculine figure" was probably a good idea. He also didn't wear
quite as much makeup. Consequently, the only guys who asked him to
dance knew what they were getting into ahead of time.
Nevertheless, despite the changes, Karl was awesome again this year.
I am sure you will all agree that Karl is almost as beautiful today
as he was nine years ago.
And you know what, he sure danced a lot! All night long, Karl had a
long line of women and men waiting to dance with him. Aren't
Halloween Parties fun?
Our BEST GROUP PICTURE went to the "Stars of the 2008 Presidential
Election".
Historically, there are two kinds of Group Pictures - Intentional
and Unintentional.
Our very first "Group Picture" Award was presented in 1998 when four
ghastly people showed up as people who "Did Not Survive the
Titanic". Mind you, that the year when "Titanic" swept the Oscars.
It was a great 'Intentional' costume.
Our second Group Picture award came in 2001. It featured another
'Intentional' group of crazies who came dressed as some MTV video
complete with big red lips for the ladies and Blues Brothers
sunglasses for the men. I wish I had learned more about their
costumes because they were pretty striking together.
I probably should have given a Group award to the three naughty Boy
Scouts in 2002, but for some reason the number 4 sticks in my mind
as the minimum. 1 is a Single, 2 is a Couple, 3 is a Crowd, and 4 is
a Group. The Boy Scouts came up one short.
In 2003, the Group Award went to constant publicity-hound Gareld
McEathron and his beautiful wife Virginia who were stunning in their
authentic Oriental robes. They joined three other people wearing
similar outfits to create a very attractive 5-person group picture.
Of course, this was an 'Unintentional' victory since Gareld had no
idea someone would be there wearing a similar costume.
Gareld's stunning victory caught the eye of another notorious
publicity hound, George Sargent. No stranger to excessive amounts of
attention, Mr. Handsome was not going to leave anything to chance.
For the following party, George talked his friends into coming as
the characters from the Wizard of Oz. Naturally George took the plum
role - Dorothy. He had great red slippers, but he forgot to bring
Toto along.
This group formed was the best "Intentional Group Picture" in studio
history. Four years later, the amazing 2004 Wizard of Oz Gang
featuring Mr Handsome still stands unchallenged as the best Group
Costume ever.
2004 featured an excellent Runner-Up Group that came dressed as
Slows and Quicks. They were pretty cute!
Although you would think the Intentionals should have a built-in
advantage, the winners of this contest usually goes to an
"unintentional" group like Hippies or Pirates. 2005 was the perfect
example.
2005 was won by a group of Unintentional Pirates. Amazing but true,
that was probably the only year Bruce and Mara didn't come as
Pirates! That was the year Mara came as a Hippie. She participated
with a huge group of Unintentional Hippies who won the Runnerup
Group prize.
There was no group winner in 2006.
I thought 2005 would be the end of that Pirate nonsense. Boy was I
wrong. After "Pirates of the Caribbean", my gosh, there must have
been 300 pirates at the 2007 Party! The whole studio went Pirate
that year. Sure enough, Mara and Bruce were front and center in the
Group Victory shot as Pirates. I think they were so taken with their
success, the Pirate concept was permanently etched in their minds.
Now I am deeply worried we may never see them in another costume.
Despite Bruce and Mara's best efforts, the Pirates did not win again
this year in 2008. Instead, this year's nod for best Group Picture
went to Sarah Palin and company - four guests, known troublemakers
mind you, who unintentionally came to the party completely unaware
that there were several other people tuned into the exact same
twisted wave length.
Yes, the Sarah Palins plus Joe the Plumber definitely stole the
Show! Historically, current events have always been fair game for
costumes. One guy came as the Stock Market Crash of 1989. And don't
forget the Titanic Victims in 1998. But I think my favorite costume
in this category has to be the guy who came as "Baby Jessica", the
little girl who fell in the well back in the early Eighties. Dressed
in baby clothes, this guy carried that stupid well around him all
evening long.
This year Mike Dwyer as Joe plus Teresa O'Donnell, Caroline Kelley,
and Lacy Crary as our three Sarahs were good for a big grin. I
especially liked Caroline in her red dress complete with shotgun and
Baby Trig.
Indeed, Lacey and Caroline had the biggest grins all night long.
They got teased a lot, but it didn't bother them at all. Their
smiles indicated they absolutely reveled in all the attention given
to them. Caroline especially showed great fondness for that gun. I
heard there was a guy in a moose outfit who ran every time Caroline
came near with her shotgun. Boy, I would loved to have gotten that
picture!
And now we turn our attention to the TOP 10 RUNNER-UP COSTUMES from
the 2008 Halloween Party.
http://www.ssqq.com/halloween/halloweenbest2008runnerup.htm
As our party has grown over the years, so has the need to extend our
recognition to more people for their creativity, hard work, and yes,
willingness to spend lots of money in a desperate attempt for
attention. Some of those costumes must have cost a small fortune to
rent!
2002 marked the first time I created an "Honorable Mention" category
to acknowledge the people who were near misses for the Top Ten. It
wasn't until 2006 that I upgraded the status of the 'Honorable
Mentions' to "Runner-Ups".
I cannot tell you how much easier this made my task in selecting
best costumes. With so many good costumes, limiting the List to just
ten costumes was driving me crazy.
This also expanded my chance to make some bribe money. For years, I
have done my best Blagojevich effort to make some money and sell
these honors. Sad to say, I don't usually get many takers, but
having two pages seemed to help. The Also-Rans discretely inquired
what it would take to make it into the Top Ten. I was pleased to be
able to sell several 'Upgrades'.
Whenever the Blagojevich money dries up, I generally have to choose
on merit. What a waste of time! Frankly speaking, that takes
forever. There are just too many good costumes to choose from. It
would be so much easier if people would just pay me some appearance
money and get it over with. For ten bucks or so - we ain't taking
Senate Seat money here mind you - someone's costume begins to look a
whole lot better to me!
But, alas, as it stands, I have to slog through all the pictures and
decide who is better than the other. Then after I complete this
thankless and LARGELY UNPAID task, throughout the year people have
the nerve to pull me aside and demand to know why their stupid
unoriginal and unscary ghost outfit didn't win. Please, you have to
do more than throw a blanket over your head to win this contest!
I actually do have some criterion to go by as opposed to "Eeny
Meenie Mynie Mo Pick the Couple that pays the Most Dough".
As a rule, in my mind "Couples" have a huge advantage over
"Singles". This year was no exception. Only four solo acts made Page
One (including the Invisible Man) against nine couples. And not one
Solo Act made Runner-Up. Now that ratio would improve instantly if
someone would slip me some dough, but oh well, as Rod B and me know
from first-hand experience, most people are too cheap to pay for
value.
1 - Our first couple on Page Two was Dan and Judy Bates. I thought
they wore wonderful 1800s Mississippi Riverboat costumes. However,
Dan later informed me they actually Dickens costumes.
Mark Twain/ Dickens/Smickens, big deal. Either way, they look great
so quit making me feel stupid for not knowing what your costume is!
Or hire a Costume Spokesperson and do society a favor. No one likes
to be embarrassed at showing Costume Ignorance. I should know.
By the way, Dan and Judy won Top Ten honors in 2006 as George and
Martha Washington. They have a history of wonderful costumes.
2- This Salsa Couple was sensational. Shall I admit the young lady
took my breath away? I don't know their names or how to describe
what they are wearing other than 'leather', but they get my vote as
the evening's hottest couple.
3 - Rowena Roche and Charlie Denton were definitely the coolest of
the Hippies! Except that something bothers me about their costumes.
Now that I think of it, I don't recall hippies being as clean cut or
costume-coordinated as Charlie and Rowena. But they were definitely
gorgeous together!
On second inspection, maybe Charlie and Rowena are a Disco couple.
Their Peace symbols have me confused. I hate Costume Confusion!
This was Rowena's first trip to the Winner's Circle, but Charlie
previously won for his Blood, Guts, and Al Gore outfit in 2006. It
was only later that I realized he should have been disqualified
after I was told that's how Charlie usually looks at work.
4 - Fortunately some real Hippies showed up. Jackie Chang and Jack
Benard were positively groovy! And yes, this is more the "Look" I
recall from this era.
I would like to thank Jack and Jackie, or Double Jack (DJ for short)
as they are sometimes known, for their continued excellence in
Halloween costumes. DJ first drew all eyes when they came to the
2006 Party as sensational characters out of Arabian Nights. Who can
forget their colorful costumes with Jack as the eight foot tall
Genie and Jackie as the shapely "I Dream of Genie" girl?
Following their success of 2006, this "IT" couple did "IT" again in
2007, making our Top Ten for the second year in a row. Taking a page
out of Bruce and Mara's playbook, they came as Pirates of the
Caribbean along with three hundred other guests. Let me add that
with apologies to Bruce, in 2007 Jack was much scarier as a Pirate
than Mr Hanka (Bruce tends to be more of the pretty pirate type).
How Jack danced with that hook in his hand is beyond me, but he gave
"Hooked on Swing" a whole new meaning.
This year, unlike Bruce and Mara, DJ decided to be original in 2008
and come as something besides Pirates. Dressed as Hippies (now
that's original!), DJ slipped to Page Two. That's what you get
sometimes for taking a fashion risk! (Bruce and Mara know better -
they are Pirates for Life).
So DJ only made the Runnerup Page... but don't feel sorry for them,
that's still an honor! Besides, they were much more authentic
Hippies than Charlie and Rowena as the Glam Hippies.
Too bad Hippies are unusually poor people. Just a little Blagojevich
money and I am positive DJ would have been promoted back to Page One
where they belonged with Bruce and Mara! In fact, I was just itching
for an excuse to bounce B & M to the Runner-Up page for their
serious fashion faux pas.
I estimate it would only taken Jack and Jackie $5 to bounce Bruce
and Mara to Page Two. What a close call! They always talk about how
the margin of victory in major contests is very small; the
exceptional and extremely important SSQQ Halloween Costume Contest
is no exception.
5 - Mike Dwyer was a double winner this year. Not only did he win
for "Best Group Picture", he and his wife Brenda won Runner-ups
Honors as Joe the Plumber and Mrs. Joe. Unfortunately, like DJ and
the other runner-ups, Mike refused to pay any upgrade dinero either
to make it to Page One. I am so frustrated. Why won't anyone pay for
an upgrade? Now I know for a fact that those over-dressed Chronicle
women pay through the nose to make that "Best Dressed List". What
does the Chronicle know about this scam that I don't?
6 - Here is yet another couple whose names I don't know their names.
I thought their Renaissance outfits were gorgeous. Just in case you
haven't noticed, I am a big sucker for Renaissance costumes. Any
cursory review of previous years reveals a Renaissance costume
winner practically every year.
7 - Jim Colby came as Steve Irwin the Crocodile Hunter and Marlane
Kayfes came as some sort of bird. Marlane made her Bird costume, by
the way, which is why I am proud of her although I have no idea what
kind of bird she was. Too bad she didn't write her Genus on the
back. That would have been a stroke of Genus. I enjoyed watching
Marlane dance in that outfit, just kind of paddling around with
those slippery yellow slippers on. I love watching sexy women
waddle. Oh the way they move!
I am guessing that Jim and Marlane have made our "Best of" issue
more times than anyone else. I see they made Runner-up in 2002 as
ancient Romans, Top Ten in 2003 as the Spaghetti Cooks, Runner-Ups
in 2004 as Naval Officers, Top Ten as Pirates in 2005, Runner-up in
2006 as Cowboy and Indian, and in 2007 as... er... as.... Oops they
didn't win in 2007. Why not?
Hmm. As I scanned the years, I couldn't help but be curious why
Marlane and Jim were not listed in 2007. So I did a review of 250
pictures from 2007. Well, I made a critical observation - they
didn't get their picture taken! In fact, they weren't even at the
party that year.
It's kind of tough to win without a picture, although a little
Blagojevich money would have solved that problem nicely. Ordinarily
the lack of attendance would be a problem, but not at a Halloween
Party. People win all the time without having to show their face.
Just ask Bob and Ana or Mr. Big Bad Wolf.
All I had to do was stick two Monster pictures up there and call
them "Jim and Marlane". No one would have known the difference and I
would have been a little richer. (Hint: In fact, it's not too late.
And that goes for the rest of you too! Just pick a year and show me
the money.)
Well, too bad about 2007, but I am glad to see Jim and Marlane made
it back to their rightful spot in 2008. I am flattered they like
this party enough to put so much effort into a wonderful series of
great costumes.
8 - Betty and Keith Baker were colorful and very cute as well as the
Mexican Senora and Senorita! I especially liked Keith's mustache
although I thought maybe a little dried Nacho cheese dip on the end
would have been a nice feature.
9 - I don't know who Mr. Beetlejuice and his girlfriend were, but
Becky Bratton definitely seemed put out that Mrs. Beetlejuice had
the nerve to wear the exact same Ghoul costume as she did!
You know, that has to really bug someone. I think Becky looked much
more ghastly (that's a compliment, mind you) than that other Hussy
Ghoul, so why did the other woman win?
Sorry, Becky, you shoulda won, but where's your Mr. Beetlejuice?
Solo acts have such a difficult uphill struggle to victory. Besides,
a little money and Becky and Mrs. Beetlejuice would have swapped
places in the picture SWIFTLY. People just don't seem to get it, do
they?
10 - The Home Shopping Network twins. Their ribbons say "Shopping
Fair". I do not know who these two ladies are, but I enjoyed their
outfits. They are practically twins! I wonder if they are twins in
real life. People might wonder how mundane "shopping outfits" made
it onto this page of such great honor. Well, these ladies made a
small contribution to the right person. Are you getting the picture?
By the way, the 2009 Party is just around the corner. Hang onto that
thought.
A TIE FOR THE CUTEST PICTURE AWARD
This year I decided to create a new category: Cutest Picture. I had
three winners this year. There is one couple - you just have to see
the picture - that has to be the one of the best dance pictures I
have ever seen. These two dancers are not only gorgeous, but they
are happy and grinning, and it is a GREAT PICTURE thanks to Steve
Gabino and his camera genius.
You might also notice that this cute couple is 'color-coordinated'.
Such is the power of color-coordination! It adds so much to a
picture! Now you see what I mean. It almost too much to take when
two people look this damn happy together and they are wearing
matching outfits! Plus they are young. I am beginning to hate them.
Now our second couple is no stranger to any of us. Maite Rombado and
Leroy Ginzel didn't win any best costume honors, but they did tie
for the Runnerup "Cutest Picture Award". They are too cute together.
Now in Leroy's case, he was robbed. Leroy came to this party as
Dracula. And let me tell you, Leroy looked great! Leroy's costume
was great! He should've won (Hint: it's not too late), but he was
disqualified on a small technicality. You see, Leroy is older than
dirt! That makes me suspicious.
I went to the Internet and found a picture of Leroy from a Toga
Party around the time of Julius Caesar. That's "BC" for you history
buffs. That gives you an idea how old Leroy is.
And there is only ONE POSSIBLE EXPLANATION for that Toga Picture -
Leroy has been around FOREVER. I think Leroy came dressed as Dracula
for a good reason: LEROY IS DRACULA! How else do you explain that
kind of immortality?
I just don't think you should win an award for coming dressed as
yourself (nor will you get any stupid award for coming dressed as
'Rick Archer/Scary Dance Teacher' either).
But even if Leroy came as himself, I think he still qualifies for
the CUTEST PICTURE award. After all, Leroy is CUTE. No one can deny
that. Plus don't you agree Maite and Leroy look happy dancing
together? Too bad I haven't seen Maite since. The most likely
explanation is that Leroy bit her after the song was over. That's
why you never see Leroy with the same girl twice!
Now the Winner of the Cutest Picture Award goes to Steve Gabino and
Vivian Gufstafson. They won for two specific reasons. One, their
picture is beyond a doubt the Best Picture. It should win! But you
and I know that excellence alone doesn't guarantee anything in this
heavily rigged contest.
So there must be some other reason as well, right?
Right!
Steve agreed to waive his usual photography fee in exchange for this
important moment of glory. That's right, Steve forked over some
serious Blagojevich dough so he and his beautiful girlfriend Vivian
could win the coveted "Cutest Picture Award". In fact, that's why I
created this new category in the first place. It was a simple excuse
to stick Steve's picture in there. Now mind you, in a perfect world,
Steve and Vivian would have won the cute award fair and square, but
it never hurts to cover your bet.
Finally we wrap things up with another tie for Best Runner-up Best
Group Picture. As it stands, there is a Tie between The Arabs and
The Candy Girls.
Joy Al-Jazrawi , Gina Nelson and her husband Brandon, plus their
vivacious mother Ann Al-Jazrawi wore authentic Arab dress. They
looked wonderful together. However, since Sam, Ann's husband, did
not show up, that cost this group terribly. You see, if Dad had been
there, they would have had FIVE people which would have beat the
CANDY GIRLS who only had FOUR people.
Lin Mills, Glenda Lee, Judy Foster came as the stunning and fetching
Candy Girls. This is what is known as an "Intentional Group". They
were intentionally stunning together. However since the Group Rule
specifies there has to be FOUR people (you are correct - I just made
this rule up), they invited special guest Mary Denise Duncan as
Cruella de Ville to join their BAD GIRL GROUP. Mary Denise helped
this group tie with the Arab Family.
This was the Halloween debut for Joy, Gina and husband Brandon, plus
Ann and her husband Sam... oops no Sam. Too bad Sam didn't make it
(But a simple bribe can always change everything.)
For weeks, Joy and Gina had promised me their Dad was coming to the
party. Imagine my disappointment when they said he had chickened out
at the last minute.
But this story has a happy ending. Gina got on the cell to her Dad
and told him to drop by. Just as the party ended, Sam came into the
studio for a last-minute tie-breaking photograph. Isn't that
wonderful!
But Sam's remarkable last-minute appearance spelled Tough luck for
the Candy Girls. What a shame. But I think they learned their
lesson...
To make the Show, hand me some dough. And if you're Cheap, your
picture's Bleep.
.................
BOMB INJURES PHYSICIAN
West Memphis, Arkansas
In case you missed this
story in the Feb 5 issue of the Chronicle, the first paragraph said:
"A car bomb explosion critically wounded Dr. Trent Pierce,
detonating in his driveway as he was leaving for work."
It was this following quote that really caught my eye:
West Memphis Police Chief Bob Paudert said, "We don't know if this
was a random target or someone specifically targeted him."
Not to make light of this tragedy, but how many car bombings in the
USA are random? To me, a car bombing seems kind of personal.
..........
THE THREE-YEAR UPDATE ON THE SSQQ SLOW DANCE AND ROMANCE STORY
http://www.ssqq.com/romance/romance2009story.htm
With Valentine's Day
rapidly approaching, I am pleased to report that Slow Dance and
Romance is indeed alive and well here at SSQQ.
In 2008, we had 15 Weddings that were either be directly attributed
to SSQQ or that SSQQ played a significant role in creating. This
amazing total was actually just par for the course. Over the past 10
years, I have listed 147 Weddings that SSQQ has been involved in...
and that's just counting the ones I know about. There are plenty
more, believe me.
2009 has already brought us our first SSQQ Wedding. Former SSQQ
Dance Instructor Leo Skiba married his long-time sweetheart Rebecca
Turini in early January 2009. Leo met Rebecca in 2005 when she took
his Beginning Two Step class here at the studio. Leo promises me
plenty of details and a picture!
Furthermore, as I write, there are at least five more SSQQ weddings
right around the corner: Patty Pennington and Guy Hoover, Olga
Bochareva and Luis Castillo, Gerry Francis and Amy Adams, Keith
Patterson and Penny Gunderson, plus Gus Donnell and Fran Zandstra.
We are approaching the three year anniversary of my Matchmaker Story
about the history of the studio's legendary ability to create
positive relationships.
(RICK ARCHER'S NOTE: This story is continued at
http://www.ssqq.com/romance/romance2009story.htm
..................................
WESTERN LINE DANCING
CLASS WITH ANITA WILLIAMS
SUNDAY AFTERNOONS 3:30-4:30 PM. Starts Sunday, February 8.
This class will meet three Sundays in February and will cost $25 To
register, just show up.
Line Dancing as most people are well aware is a series of steps
danced in unison by a group of people in line formation. Everyone is
doing the same step at the same time. It is very popular with all
ages and can be fast or slow, set to all types of music and dance
styles. (i.e. cha-cha, waltz, east coast swing, polka, jazz)
Line Dancing has several benefits. It doesn't require a dance
partner, it promotes cardiovascular health through physical workouts
of varying intensity, it increases mobility, it creates the
opportunity for creativity and memorizing the patterns exercises
your brain.
That's the official description. The unofficial description is that
Line Dancing is Fun! It is dancing and exercise rolled into one.
Since the class is open to both Beginners and Intermediate dancers,
Anita will teach two to three dances each week, some easy, some
difficult. In addition, she will review them so you won't forget
them.
What to bring: soled shoes or tennis shoes, layered clothing, a
sense of humor.
What to expect: Expect to have a lot of fun.
Rick Archer's Note: Some classes are offered at SSQQ to pay the rent
and some classes are offered to nurture the soul. This is a class
that deserves to succeed. We have decided to skip starting it
Superbowl Sunday, but plan on joining the following Sunday, February
8 at 3:30 pm. Just show up!
BACKGROUND ON THE LINE DANCE CLASS
Anita Williams began teaching at SSQQ in 1996. Besides being an
awesome dancer, Anita is also very funny! She is teaching this class
at my request. You would be surprised how many people bug me about
Line Dancing. When Cher Longoria told me Anita had won a major line
dance contest recently, I decided to ask her what she thought.
Anita replied, "Rick, check out this
new dance
I learned at when I went to World's this year...
In response to your question, I'd love to see something like this
take off at the studio, but it's hard to get line dancing going in
Texas. If we were up north, no problem but here in Houston it's not
so popular.
I guess people think of it as a little old lady's dance, but if
people saw some of the new stuff they would be amazed. It's so much
fun. BTW did you know that 90% of the line dances are NOT country
music?"
..........
ANITA'S RESUME
SSQQ Veterans will remember that Anita competed with the SSQQ World
Champion dance team known as Heartbeat around 2001
(
http://www.ssqq.com/stories/advent35.htm
Besides Heartbeat, Anita
has also competed individually. She advanced to the professional
level in 2003 and won the UCWDC World's West Coast Swing Female
Diamond Advanced title. Anita has coached amateur students to
numerous championships including 4 World titles and one National
title.
Anita currently competes in line dance at the advanced and Showcase
level. She recently placed 2nd overall at UCWDC World's in Advanced
Classic line dance and 3rd in Showcase Line Dance competition. When
Anita is not competing, she teaches line dance at various dance
events all over the country.
..................
UPDATE ON CONQUEST 2009, OUR SUMMER DANCE CRUISE
http://www.ssqq.com/travel/conquest2009.htm
In last week's issue, I
welcomed these seven people to our upcoming August cruise:
Jack Myers
Jo Wilson
Keith Baker
Betty Baker
Gene Garner
Charlie Denton
Rowena Roche
Now, one week later, welcome aboard to nine more new passengers!
Lori Hill
Virginia Howe
Martin Pelaez
Nadia Pelaez
Caitlin Prescott
Cindy Flores
Michael Flores
Penney Warren
Tim Bailey
In case you are counting, that makes 16 people in just two weeks.
----- Original Message -----
From: e
To: marla@ssqq.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 9:23 AM
Subject: Carribean Cruise in August - Questions
Marla,
Hi, I have been reading about the SSQQ trips for years now in the
newsletter. I'm finally in a position in my life to consider going.
I do have some questions, though.
If you don't have a roommate do you collect names of those who are
looking for people to share with and match them up (sort of potluck
like at camp)? If there is an odd number I guess that person will
need to pay a single room rate? Does that even exist or is it double
the price? I've never been on a cruise so I don't know how that all
works.
In the past what has been the mix of people? Are they mainly
couples? Are there lots of single women and men or has it been
mainly couples and a few singles? Of course I'm concerned that it
will be heavy with single women on the dancing nights.
From: Marla
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:26 PM
To: e
Subject: Re: Carribean Cruise in August - Questions
Hello Elizabeth,
1. I match up roommates based on the cabin type selected and then
the passenger's age.
Yes, it is like potluck. Most times it works; once in a while you
roll your eyes. One hint: If the registration form is turned in
prior to the deadline, we will do our best to find a roommate
scientifically.
last minute signups can't be choosy. Single occupancy is always an
option.
2. The Caribbean cruise mix is usually 60% singles/40% couples. The
ratio of men to women is usually 40%men/ 60% women. Whether you
dance or not is pretty much up to you. If you wait for someone to
ask you, you will sit for awhile. Feel free to ask people to dance..
.
The best thing to do is to take some group dance classes prior to
the cruise and get to know everybody.
All I can tell you is that I was new to the studio in 2001 and
signed up for the cruise. The boy/girl ratio and the married to
single ratio was not any different then. I met my future husband on
the cruise. I am not saying that this will happen to you, but life
is what you wish to make of it.
I hope you will join us,
.......................
UPDATE ON OUR BARCELONA 2009 TRIP
http://www.ssqq.com/travel/barcelona2009.htm
From: Marla Archer
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 4:47 PM
To: dance@ssqq.com
Subject: Barcelona
Hello Everybody,
We are currently up to 37 passengers who are headed to the world's
most favorite Western Mediterranean cruise destinations.
If you have been sitting on the fence, it is now time to sign up for
the cruise! Don't miss out on sharing so many adventures with all
your friends in the world's most favorite vacation destination.
A $250 deposit will hold your spot on the trip all the way until
final payment on July 15th, 2009. That is right, you have six months
to save for this fabulous cruise!
Royal Caribbean has given me a few more days to hold on to my
reserved group space. We have until Wednesday, January 28th to add
anyone to the group. On Thursday, January 29th I can still add
people to our group, however it will be at the prevailing rate.
Group Pricing is as follows:
Inside Category N -- $896 per person cruise only
Oceanview Category I -- $1136 per person cruise only
Balcony Category E1 -- $1446 per person cruise only
All prices are double occupancy.
You will be pleased to know that this trip has become less
expensive. For one thing, the fuel surcharge is gone. In addition,
the room prices have dropped $170 for the Inside Cabins, $220 for
Oceanview, and $60 less for Balconies. Also encouraging is the Euro
to Dollar ratio has improved dramatically in our favor since last
year's trip. Air fare has dropped considerably as well. This trip
will never be inexpensive, but at least it is becoming more of a
bargain.
I hope you will decide to join us for another trip of a lifetime!
Don't miss out on this wonderful experience!!!
You may email or fax me the information or simply hand the form to
Rick or me at the studio.
http://www.ssqq.com/travel/barcelona2009registration.htm
....................
EXPLORING POTENTIAL FUTURE CRUISE DESTINATIONS
(Rick Archer's Note: This was an article sent to me by Alan Fox,
owner of Vacations to Go, a Houston-based Travel Agency that has
grown to be one of the most successful travel agencies in the
country. Alan is a former basketball buddy of mine and good friend.
Here is Alan's first-hand story of his trip to Antarctica.)
From: VacationsToGo.com
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:21 PM
To: dance@ssqq.com
Subject: Vacations To Go Cruise Newsletter antarctica
Dear Mr. Archer,
Alan Fox is cruising Antarctica on the Minerva, chartered by Regent
Seven Seas, and his first report follows.
________________________________________
Crrrreeeeeeeeeeeekkk.
The walls and decks grind and groan.
ShuuuweeeuuuWEEEE!!!
The frigid wind howls at our window.
Whump, whump!
The bow of the Minerva rises on the crest of a massive wave before
crashing back into the froth and spray, sending shudders from bow to
stern.
I am writing today from the heart of the notorious Drake Passage, en
route from Port Stanley (Falkland Islands) to Antarctica. After a
lifetime of dreaming, a year of anticipation and thousands of miles
covered since leaving Houston six days ago, I am 36 hours from
setting eyes on the white continent.
Today is our first full day in the passage (a crossing takes two
days and two nights), and we are bouncing about in what is referred
to as a "whole gale," a 10 on the 1-12 Beaufort Scale, where 12 is a
hurricane.
The Drake is known for the world's roughest water, and it is said
that crossing her is the tax one must pay to see Antarctica. The
Drake Tax is paid in two installments, one down and one back, and
some passengers pay more than others.
When we reach the Antarctic Peninsula we will be protected from high
seas by the mountainous coastline, but in this 500-mile stretch of
open water, motion sickness is a real possibility.
About half of the 198 passengers onboard have failed to make a
public appearance since we departed Port Stanley last night. At
least their cabins are comfortable and cozy, and those who can raise
their heads are able to watch ship lectures, movies and DVDs on TV.
The ship's crew takes numerous precautions before entering such a
storm. Metal covers have been installed over portholes on the lowest
passenger deck to prevent water from entering as waves slap the
sides of the ship. "Sickness bags" have been placed every few feet
along hand rails throughout the vessel.
In the sparsely attended dining room, chairs and tables are
permanently chained or bolted to the floor, along with most of the
rest of the ship's furniture. Tablecloths have been dampened to
prevent plates and glasses from sliding, but unattended silverware
will dance off your plate in seconds.
Items in our cabin seem to have sprung to life. Drawers swing open
and then close on their own, as does one of the closet doors, and
hanging clothes slide back and forth on the bar. The curtain over
our window hugs the wall as the ship leans to port but as she tilts
to starboard, the bottom of the curtain swings away from the wall
and the twilight fills the room.
It's impossible to capture the size of these waves in a photograph
so I went to an exposed wing of the bridge and took a series of
shots of the bow of the ship to give you a sense of the motion we
are experiencing. They are in the accompanying slide show and yes, I
was soaked head to foot in the process!
Those of us who were out and about today have learned to work with
the pitch and roll of the ship rather than fight it. With feet
splayed outward like a penguin for extra stability, we rush forward
when our path slopes downhill and pause momentarily when it tilts
uphill, and weave from wall to wall as we move along hallways.
Secretly, I am enjoying this new way of walking and also found the
shower experience entertaining, slipping and sliding from one
side--thump--to another--thump--of the small enclosure. No doubt
sensible people skipped their showers altogether.
Our trip began with an overnight flight from Houston to Buenos
Aires, where Regent Seven Seas had arranged a pre-cruise stay at the
upscale and ideally located Melia Hotel. Buenos Aires is a friendly,
walkable city, with nice restaurants, spacious parks and
pedestrian-only shopping streets.
The highlight of our afternoon stroll was the sprawling and
immaculately maintained Recoleta Cemetery, final resting place for
Eva Perón and Argentina's famous and well-to-do of the past 150
years.
Mausoleums looming 10 to 20 feet high are packed tightly in a maze
of paved sidewalks and alleys that are oddly reminiscent of a
19th-century European town, about 2/3 scale. When the gates close
for the evening, a colony of feral cats remain behind, Recoleta's
only living inhabitants.
For dinner, we enjoyed Argentine steaks and local wines but with a
3am wakeup call, we were not able to take in the city's most popular
tourist entertainment, a tango performance.
The next day, our chartered flight rumbled down the runway well
before dawn and four hours later, we found the southern tip of South
America shrouded in clouds. We descended through the soft white
light and emerged to find the snowcapped mountains of the Andes on
the right side of the plane, towering above our heads.
Moments later, we touched down in Ushuaia, Argentina, the
southernmost city in the world. It was cool and gray and drizzling
rain as we boarded buses for a tour of the area.
Ushuaia has a population of 65,000 and is built around a harbor in
the Beagle Channel and ringed by soaring mountains. We and our
fellow passengers enjoyed a Gaucho dance performance and stopped by
the origin (or termination point) of the Pan American Highway, which
runs more than 16,000 miles north to Prudhoe Bay, Alaska.
Ushuaia refers to itself as The End of the World and with its
isolation and 160 days of rain or snow each year, it does feel a bit
like that. But as the jumping-off point for most Antarctic cruises,
it is perhaps more accurate to say that Ushuaia is the end of one
world and the beginning of another.
That evening we sailed for Port Stanley, our only planned port call
outside Antarctica. We spent a day at sea photographing the
albatrosses and petrels following the ship and attending interesting
lectures from the ornithologist, marine biologist and other experts
and specialists onboard.
Shortly before arriving in the Falklands yesterday, the leading edge
of the storm we're now in caught up with us, preventing the ship
from docking in Stanley and making the harbor too rough for tender
operation. We were in sight of the town of Stanley but unable to
reach her, so we spent the day tethered to a tanker, refueling, a
very delicate operation in such high winds.
It was early confirmation of what our expedition leader, Suzana, had
told us, that in this part of the world, we will always have a Plan
A, a Plan A and another Plan A.
Last night, after dinner in the protected waters of the Falkland
Islands, we battened down the hatches (literally) and sailed into
the gathering storm.
Crrrreeeeeeeeeeeeekkk.
ShuuuweeeuuuWEEEE!!!
Whump, whump!
The adventure has begun.
Written by Alan Fox...somewhere in Drake Passage
....................
SECRET SSQQ ANTI-TERRORISM WEAPONS
(Rick Archer's Note: It takes a lot to surprise me these days, but I
admit I was taken aback by a request from the Department of Defense
to put in a bid for weapons systems. I promise you I did not make
this up. In the meantime, if any of you have developed any
anti-terrorism weapons, be sure to let me know and I will put in a
bid.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Department of Defense
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:31 AM
To: dance@ssqq.com
Subject: SSQQ Dance Studio - Department of Defense Business
Listing ID: A2225731371
Complete and update information to list SSQQ Dance Studio as a
supplier available for Department of Defense bid and sales
opportunities in the 2009 Department of Defense Buyers Guide.
The information on your company and products will be accessed by
Department of Defense and military purchasing agents and buying
facilities.
Please complete and submit before 02/06/09 or you will not be
listed. Please click below to complete and update your information
(you may have to copy and paste into your browser):
http://www.federalbuyersguide.com/
The Department of Defense Buyers Guide is published by Federal
Buyers Guide Inc., a private sector organization that has provided
vendor information to the government for over 30 years. If you have
any questions regarding pricing or information
..........................
FANTASY ISLAND REVISITED
http://ssqq.com/archive/fantasyisland.htm
(Rick Archer's Note: As most of you know, I rarely make any sort of
mistake. So it came as a crushing disappointment to discover I had
made only my second mistake in the past 30 years. I am so
embarrassed! What will this do to the confidence of my Newsletter
readers to know I make mistakes?)
From: blakeSent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 10:29 AM
To: dance@ssqq.com
Subject: Fantasy Island
G'Day Rick, my names Blake and I'm from Australia.
I have been surfing some of your interesting write ups even the
stuff up with the sultans palace. lol.
Anyway I like what you do but I thought I would inform you that some
of your fantasy Island photos are of a place called the Maldives.
They are a bunch of Islands so small they don't appear on the world
map, (guessing invisible from space). They are located below India
and Sri Lanka slightly to the South West.
Many of the hotels and accommodation is built in the water mainly
because there isn't enough room on the island.
Sadly this area of the ocean is also the Tsunami area
My partner and I are travelling there later this year and its not as
expensive as you would have thought, although I haven't any figures
for you we live on a modest budget and find it affordable.
Perhaps it is cheaper in flights due to location of Perth,
Australia? Dunno
The photos you identified as "Tahiti" are exactly the same as the
ones as "The Maldives". I think whoever is sending you these "photo
packages" is mixing them up a bit. Laddahs!
http://ssqq.com/archive/fantasyisland.htm
...........
LAST WEEK'S COMPLAINT OF THE WEEK:
THE DAUGHTER OF DYNAMIC GRAPHICS FOUNDER DEFENDS HER FATHER'S MEMORY
AGAINST RICK ARCHER'S GARBAGE ARTICLE
Rick Archer's Note: Many of you have complimented me over the years
over the unusual artwork displayed on the SSQQ Dance Studio walls.
This artwork was created by an anonymous man who worked for Dynamic
Graphics, a commercial graphic arts service.
I wrote an article about Dynamic Graphics where I detailed three
issues that angered me about their service.
http://www.ssqq.com/stories/advent44.htm
In January 2009, a woman
named Kim Bryan wrote to complain about my article. Among other
things, Ms. Bryan claimed I had been disrespectful to her deceased
father. This was a very odd accusation considering I had never even
heard of the man.
In last week's Newsletter, I listed Ms. Bryan's complaint.
To my surprise, my own daughter Sam read the letters and rushed to
my defense. Sam wrote a very nice letter which I will now share.
From: Samantha
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:34 AM
To: kim bryan
Cc: dance@ssqq.com
Subject: Emails concerning Dynamic Graphics article on ssqq.com
Miss Bryan:
In one of your previous emails addressed to my father, you asked "Do
you have someone who will be left to appreciate what you have done?"
In response to this question, I would like to inform you that, yes,
there is someone who appreciates what her father has done. For his
entire life my father has worked harder than almost anyone I know. I
have to tell you, I don't exactly appreciate the attacks you've
repeatedly assailed my Dad with.
In no way whatsoever has my father personally attacked your father.
The article he wrote in regards to Dynamic Graphics has to do with
members of the company who made decisions in recent years. As
someone who has spent numerous hours of her childhood loading
pictures from Liquid Library on to her father's computer, and as
someone who served as the hand model when the article in question
was originally written, I have to agree with my Dad that these
pictures have had no use to him. Now, I can understand that there
are other companies in the world who may have use for these
pictures, but my Dad has the right to complain. The article he
wrote, which mainly was about Liquid Library and his frustration
over never discovering the true identity of "Chris," is something he
was completely within his rights to do.
I appreciate the story of your father's battle to attain rights to
his company. For thirty years, my Dad has fought tooth and nail with
several different parties to keep his business going. That business,
may I add, has provided me with opportunities neither of my parents
could ever have dreamed of. I'm sure that you feel similarly about
Dynamic Graphics.
There are a few accounts on the internet about how my father's
business has wronged certain customers or how they didn't receive a
positive experience at the studio. In all the instances where I have
actually taken the time to read these accounts the thought of
belaboring the authors with a personal history of the studio has
never crossed my mind. When it comes to running a business, things
happen that are out of our (as two people who have personal ties to
said businesses) control. I see no reason to personally attack these
people simply because they didn't have a pleasant experience at the
studio, which happens to be the place where I took my first step and
where my parents met. Were it not for the studio, I wouldn't exist.
But I do not fault someone for having a negative experience and
writing about it on the internet. It's their constitutional right to
have the ability to do so.
You stated that if my father had a understanding of the business, he
"would be more appreciative." You stated that he "desecrated [your
father's] life and what he did." You stated that you have "no use"
for my Dad and that your father "created out of nothing you could
not do." If you were actually cognizant of the studio and its
makings, you would know that artwork pulled from Dynamic Graphics'
catalogs adorn the studio's walls. You would know that regardless of
these photographs that my father begrudgingly pays for, he still
purchases Liquid Library for the artwork. You mentioned something
about the "stupid small experience" that my Dad has had with Dynamic
Graphics, the company he has been pumping thousands of dollars into
for decades. I would like to point out the "stupid small experience"
that you have had with my father's own business and my father
personally. My father is a man I respect and a man who has been a
terrific father and has built a business literally from the ground
up.
Quite frankly, you have been rude and you have certainly stepped out
of place. I, for one, will be someone who will appreciate, and does
appreciate, what my father has done. I am sorry that you have taken
offense to his complaint. But he has nothing to apologize for.
Samantha Archer
Daughter of the founder of SSQQ Dance Studio
http://www.ssqq.com/stories/advent44.htm
(Rick Archer's Note: I
am proud to announce that Sam will be a Freshman in college next
year at Loyola New Orleans. At an early age, I noticed Sam's flair
for the dramatic. I encouraged her to pursue her acting ability and
see where it would take her. Sam has had quite a bit of success in
Drama as a result. This spring she will have starring roles in her
school's productions of "Meet Me in St Louis" as well as "The
Importance of Being Ernest".
Sam recently auditioned for the Drama Program at Loyola and received
a remarkable scholarship for her efforts. Although personally I am
very shy, I am very proud that my daughter is completely comfortable
under the bright lights!)
............
THIS WEEK'S COMPLAINT OF THE WEEK: TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY
Rick Archer's Note: I used to have a newsletter section known as
'complaint of the month'. Now that the world has turned dangerously
towards a perpetual bad mood, I have decided to change this category
to "Complaint of the Week".
Last week we had a woman who said I had defamed her father (see
above).
This week I was threatened with even more legal action. It's a
jungle out there, folks.
From: S A
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 7:23 PM
To: dance@ssqq.com
Subject: Pre-Suit Notice Pursuant to the Texas DTPA
Dear Rick,
I am writing regarding my wife's and my purchase of salsa classes on
February 3, 2009. Confirmation code AUTH/TKT and AUTH/TKT
As stated in our phone conversation yesterday afternoon and evening,
February 3, 2009, I did not know until after making my online
purchase that my wife and I would have to switch partners during
class. We did not know that before purchasing the classes and had we
known we would not have signed up. One of our central goals in
signing up for a dance class was to be able to dance together. While
the information is on the website, it is NOT prominently displayed
nor even easy to find unless you know to look for it. I only noticed
it AFTER we received our confirmation receipt on which this policy
is printed. Receiving this information after the confirmation is
obviously too late to be of use in deciding whether to purchase your
service. While I understand the policy, it is obviously a common
problem for many couples, as evidenced by the complaints displayed
on your website by your customers (which were also not easy to
find). Yet even knowing this, SSQQ has made no effort to clearly
disclose this policy on your website.
Upon discovering this policy, I immediately called the studio and
asked for a refund, but was told that it could not be done over the
phone because it requires the "swiping" of my card (which is
questionable) and that I had to go to SSQQ physically to obtain the
refund. This is an onerous and unnecessary policy; if you accept
money over the internet you should be able to reverse the charges.
Regardless of whether this is a fair business practice, I was
willing to do it to get my $90 refund.
However, on top of the requirement of having to physically go to the
studio to obtain a refund, SSQQ also only provides a one-hour grace
period after classes begin, after which time no refunds are given.
Worried I might not be able to leave work in time to make the
cutoff, I called the studio at approximately 6:56 pm on February 3,
and asked if I could receive a grace period beyond the 1 hour or be
permitted to go to the Studio on February 4. I was flatly, and
rudely, denied that simple courtesy, with your response: "Good
luck!"
It appears that your policy not to provide refunds after the 1st
hour of the class is designed to avoid being asked for refunds after
a certain amount of services have been rendered. While this policy
appears to have a legitimate business purpose under certain
circumstances, it has no application to me or this situation. I
asked for a refund immediately after the purchase was made upon
learning about a very important term in our contract, a term not
clearly displayed before the purchase, and one that had I known
about, I would not have made the purchase in the first place. Even
assuming for argument's sake your policy is fair, the SSQQ
confirmation acknowledges you will make exceptions in advance. You
made no effort to make an exception in this very exceptional case
where I was quick to notice my mistake and request a refund well in
advance.
Put purely and simply, you have accepted my money without providing
any services in return and implementing policies that are onerous,
unconscionable, and deceptive. There is no legitimate business
reason not to return my $90 under these circumstances. This letter
is an attempt to resolve this dispute amicably, and to comply with
the pre-suit notice requirements of the Texas Deceptive Trade
Practices Act. I am still willing to come to your studio to obtain
the $90 refund if you tell me that my effort will be met with
success. This is all that I am asking for at this time. If you
continue to refuse, I will be forced to consider formal legal
proceedings, at which time I will seek the $90, court costs,
attorneys fees, and potentially treble damages under the DTPA.
From: Rick Archer
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 11:19 AM
To: SA
Subject: RE: Pre-Suit Notice Pursuant to the Texas DTPA
When we first spoke on Tuesday, Feb 3, you explained to me that you
had registered yourself and your wife for a dance class using online
registration. You then said that after reading the online receipt,
you realized that we insist that students switch partners in group
classes. You then said your wife refused to switch partners.
Therefore you expected a refund.
I then explained the rules for obtaining a refund. I said studio
policy required you to come to the studio during Registration the
day of your first class (or prior to) so we could swipe your credit
card and cancel your transaction. I recall that you were unhappy at
being expected to drive across town to correct your own mistake. You
then proceeded to berate me for five minutes for my failure to
provide an online refund mechanism. You said this was terribly
inconvenient. You made it clear that you were upset that my studio
did not allow you to change your mind using the Internet.
FYI, the studio on-line service was initiated seven years ago as a
convenience to our students. For seven years, this service has
allowed people to simply walk through the doors and begin classes.
It was never intended to be a sophisticated e-tail operation such as
you might find at Amazon.
Furthermore, although you have continuously berated me for my
'failure' to provide a simple way for you to cancel your
registration 'on-line', I do not believe I am obligated to do so.
Now it is true that I personally can choose to invest my own time
and reverse your charges using the Internet. What you and many other
people do not understand is this is not an easy task. There is no
'find' function. I can't simply enter your credit card number and
tell it to search and refund. In order to locate your transaction on
the Internet, I am forced to sift through hundreds of transactions
one by one until I find your particular order. This process is
typically ten to fifteen minutes long.
Personally speaking, I refuse to be obligated to invest my time to
correct YOUR MISTAKE. You signed up for the class. No one made you
do it. If it comes down to you driving fifteen minutes or me sitting
there doing hunt and peck on the Internet for fifteen minutes, why
do you expect me to correct your mistake for you?
Now I agree that at the time of your first phone call, you were
entitled to a Refund. So I carefully explained that we have people
paid to handle your Refund. All you had to do was drive to the
studio that evening, hand them your credit card, and your problem
would be solved. You were unhappy about that option and spent a
great deal of time expressing yourself on that topic. I believe I
listened to you chew me out for seven minutes before you finally
decided to hang up.
Regarding the second phone call that Tuesday, I agree with you that
around 7 pm that evening, the business phone rang at my home. You
probably are unaware of this, but the studio phone hours run from 10
am to 3 pm weekdays. My daughter and I had just sat down to eat
dinner together. Even though this was my day off and even though the
phone was ringing 4 hours after my phone shift ended, I decided to
leave my meal and pick up the business phone. At the time I assumed
it was someone who needed directions to the studio. I was trying to
do someone a good deed. My mistake. As you know, no good deed goes
unpunished.
During our second phone conversation at 7 pm, you asked for an
extension in the time limit necessary to obtain the refund at the
studio because you were stuck at work. You wanted the Registrar to
remain at the studio an extra half hour after the 8 pm deadline. I
explained that was unreasonable. I said you had known the entire day
what the rules were. Take some responsibility. I saw no reason to
call the Registrar at the studio to ask her to remain another 30
minutes plus add additional payroll expenses for your personal
convenience.
You lost your temper and began to berate me again. You complained
about my deceptive advertising, my unfair business practices, and
then you proceeded to say you felt you were justified in coming a
day late to the studio to obtain your refund. I replied, 'Good
luck'. I deeply apologize if that response sounded rude to you.
At that point, you said you were a lawyer and threatened to sue me
in small claims court. My daughter overheard this entire
conversation on speaker phone. Now that I was being faced with court
action, that was the point when I got fed up. I was tired of
listening to you bully me and I wanted to eat my dinner. So I
responded 'be my guest' and I hung up on you.
And now you have written me this threatening email because you think
your status as a lawyer gives you some special privilege to bend the
rules to your own convenience.
I don't want your money. I never did. All I ever really wanted from
you was to for you to stop harassing me for your own mistake, but I
guess I am out of luck on that score.
THE LAST WORD
Just so all of you understand, ninety-eight percent of all SSQQ
policies are directed towards one thing -
minimizing the complaints. I truly enjoy teaching dance classes, for
the most part I enjoy writing newsletters, and I enjoy throwing a
good party once a while.
What I don't enjoy is having people chew me out for their own
problems. No one asked this guy to sign up. So suddenly his wife
doesn't want to switch partners. Is this something I am supposed to
care about? The way I see it, this is none of my business.
But this guy decides to make it my business. First he spends 10
minutes chewing me because my web site is too big, too confusing,
too mediocre and my online system is unfair, deceptive, and out of
date and my policies are unreasonable, not properly advertised, and
discriminatory against a man who simply wants to dance with his own
wife.
Then he calls me up at 7 pm the same night to demand the Registrar
stay 30 minutes late for his own convenience. When I say 'no', I
proceed to get 10 more minutes of the same stuff I listened to that
morning. Plus he threatens a law suit for good measure.
Next I receive the email above. I have the joy of spending 30
minutes writing a reply not to mention the anger I felt at receiving
another threat of a law suit. Here's a guy who is too important to
follow the rules, so he gets his way by using his law degree as
leverage.
Personally, who wants to go to court to fight back? Even if I win,
what do I win? I have wasted an entire day of my life, money
defending myself, plus all the suffering of worrying about the
outcome. That, my friends, is what is known as a 'Phyrric Victory'.
Now what if this guy was forced to pay my lawyer plus pay me for my
time if I won? That would change things a bit, wouldn't it?
I have disliked lawyers in general for a long time. This guy is the
perfect example of the kind of bully our society gives free rein to.
Anyone can sue anyone and make their life miserable (eg, the
Victoria Osteen shakedown and the 67 million dry cleaning lawsuit).
But if there was a realistic penalty for the loser of these kinds of
frivolous lawsuits, I think we would all breathe easier.
...............
AND THAT'S A WRAP FOR FEBRUARY 2009 ISSUE TWO.
THIS ISSUE WAS 31 PAGES LONG. SO MUCH FOR MY VOW OF BREVITY FROM A
COUPLE WEEKS AGO.
TRILLIONS OF ELECTRONS HAVE BEEN DESTROYED IN THE CREATION OF THIS
ISSUE. TOUGH.
THANKS FOR READING!
|
Issue
Three
The
February 2009 SSQQ Newsletter Issue Three
Written by Rick Archer
PARKING WARNING: On Wednesday, February 11, a woman who said she
worked at the ATT building across the street from the hospital
warned SSQQ students not to park in their garage. She said they
would begin to tow vehicles soon.
This garage has long been marked with tow away signs, but they have
never been enforced before.
Please be careful.
...............
THE RED AND WHITE VALENTINES SWING PARTY THIS WEEKEND!
http://www.ssqq.com/ssqq/party03.htm
Saturday, February 14, 9
- 11:30 pm
Crash Courses 7-9 PM
(to register for a class, just show up around 6:45 pm)
CINDERELLA'S WALTZ (WESTERN WALTZ ADVANCED PATTERNS) - Rick
SLOW DANCING - Marla (couples only)
RUMBA - The Latin Dance of Romance - Jill
PUTTIN' ON THE RITZ: BEGINNING SWING - Becky
VALENTINE'S DAY SWING PATTERNS (ADVANCED PATTERNS) - Maureen
SINATRA FOXTROT - Jack
About the Party: There will be mostly Swing music (both East and
West Coast) played at this party. In addition, as a nod to the
Romantic nature of the evening, expect many Waltzes and some Sinatra
Foxtrots as well. And I will take song requests as well.
In addition, if I hear ONE MORE 'SINGLE' PERSON tell me they aren't
coming because it will only be couples, I will beat them with a
pillow. That is a promise.
This is a dance party. At SSQQ, everyone dances with everyone. For
example, I am happily married, but I promise you that Marla and I do
not want to dance exclusively with each other all night long.
Married people like to dance with single people too! We are all
friends, remember?
You single people need to quit acting like refugees from a leper
colony. Singles will not be 'singled out', I assure you. In
addition, we will do some John-Paul-Jones dances and partner
switching dances so that everyone participates.
..............
THE SSQQ SALSA EXPLOSION DANCE PARTY NEXT WEEKEND!
http://www.ssqq.com/ssqq/party04salsa.htm
Saturday, February 21, 9
- Midnight
CRASH COURSES 7-9 PM
(To register, just show at 6:45 and pay at the door)
DIRTY SALSA - Dakota
BEG BACHATA - Linda
BEG SALSA - Angela and Morris
SALSA DIPS AND LUNGES - Noe
BEGINNING CUMBIA - Steve
INTERMEDIATE SALSA PTNS - Ulyses and Shelli
There will be a Salsa dance demonstration during the party plus
Sonja and Noe will demonstrate Argentine Tango again.
.................................
WHAT DO THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE HAVE IN COMMON?
Cristina Lozano and Conor O'Muirgheasa, Ron Fiske and Lin Mills,
Denise and Jim Duncan, Gerry Francis and Amy Adams, Tim Francis and
Anita Leung, Linda and Don Francis, Robin Curbello and Ed Miller,
David Diggs, Cheryl Rudolph and Robin Curbello, Lin Mills and Judy
Foster, Ron Fiske, Andy Regnier, Corky Ament, Peggy McElroy, Cindy
and Mike Flores, CA Riser and Cathy Bryant, Cheryl Rudolph and James
Culotta, Lee Ann Parkinson, Chris Shields, Deborah Jenkins, Sharon
Allen, Mary and George Cooper, Iqbal Nagji and Lin Mills, Phyllis
Sullivan and Rick Archer, Cindy Flores and Danny Herdejurgen, Holly
Vitemb and Lori Hill, Corky Ament, Lee Ann Parkinson and Ron Fiske,
Bernardine and Loy Farmer, Annie Fletcher and Richard Byrd, Ann
Wells, Joe Lachner (Mr. Smile) and Patty Harrison, Patty Lynch,
Shawn Eldridge, Bobby Kirkpatrick, Carol Batson and Eduardo Garcia,
Judy Foster, Chris Shields, Karen Groom, Tiffany, Jean, and Kurt
Wind, Gareld and Virginia McEathron, Lori Hill and Joel Konkel, Jeff
Plaster and Deborah Taylor, Cyndi Bozeman and Jimmy Gunter, Allison
Crunk and Barbara Fisher, Bette Polishak and Tom Huddleston, Montana
Lee and Rona Kenter, Holly Jolly and Joel Konkel, Annie Fletcher and
Richard Byrd, Rowena Roche and Charley Denton, Karen Wisniewski and
Dakota Wilhelm, George Sargent and Mary Webb, Barbara Fisher and
Andy Regnier, Ann McKenzie and John Hall, Sandy Hartman, Phyllis
Center of Attention, and Louis Cottrell, Vivian Gufstafson and Steve
Gabino, Andy Regnier and Phil Liggett, Kim Gilmore and Kit Carney,
Marilyn Chambers and David Brewer, Dina Burton and Gary Catalan,
Sanae Kelly and Martha Bouldin, Karen Groom and Larry Bench, Jack
Myers and Jo Wilson, Loy and Bernardine Farmer, Scott Ladell and
Bryan Vavra, Jose Larios, Leslie Goldsmith and Sol Eisenbaum, Nancy
McCormick and Ken Landgrum, Dwight Harrison and Myra Ephros, Rick
Elizondo and Denise Duncan, Albertin Gharcheghah and Maite Rombado,
Marie Cohen and Joy Isiminger, Ed Newman, Marsha Baxmann and Phyllis
Sullivan, Leroy the Vampire Ginzel, plus the Three Known
Troublemakers: See No Evil, Hear No Evil, and Speak No Evil.
ANSWER: I just published their picture from the Conquest 2008
Cocktail Party. Better go see your picture! http://www.ssqq.com/travel/conquest2008pics02.htm
UPDATE ON CONQUEST 2009, OUR SUMMER DANCE CRUISE
http://www.ssqq.com/travel/conquest2009.htm
We are up to 30 people for this year's Conquest Cruise in August.
...............
STEVE GABINO, MASTER PHOTOGRAPHER
http://www.ssqq.com/halloween/stevegabino.htm
Recently I discovered that Steve is available as a freelance
photographer. Steve has been honing his photography skills on a
near-daily basis ever since digital cameras came along. I think it
is great that Steve is able to parlay a hobby into a side business.
I did the same thing with 'dancing' about 34 years ago and it worked
out pretty well for me.
If you would like to learn more about Steve and his photography
skills, please visit:
http://www.ssqq.com/halloween/stevegabino.htm
..............
BOB AND ANA, OUR FAVORITE PALINDROMIC DANCE COUPLE, ARE CITED FOR
EXCESSIVE CUTENESS!
In last week's Newsletter, I wrote this story about Bob Graham and
Ana Torres.
"For two straight years, there has been a very scary couple that has
REFUSED to take their masks off. This presents a real problem for
me. You see, many people who come to the SSQQ party worry about
people who don't take off their masks.
To them, this goes straight to their deepest fears that REAL
MONSTERS DO ATTEND THIS PARTY. I refuse to confirm or deny this
allegation other than to say it is a distinct possibility. Let me
add this is a subject I prefer not to write too much about for fear
that it might affect attendance. There have been mysterious
disappearances over the years. People come to the Party and then we
never see them again. I just tell them they met someone cute and
have better things to do than dance, but deep down I admit I wonder
myself.
That said, I openly admit this particular 2008 Monster couple
(Chucky and the Spike-haired Alien Babe) are flesh and blood human
beings. But other people didn't know this. Chucky and Spike
certainly did frighten a lot of people at this year's party. I got a
lot of complaints!
Nor is this the first time guests have complained to me about this
same couple! It happened last year too. I let Chuck and Spike get
away with it last year, but I am telling you, they will hurt future
attendance if I don't say something right now. That explains why I
have decided to take matters into my own hands and unmask My
Favorite Monsters. Their names are Bob and Ana!
For two straight years, Bob Graham and Ana Torres have remained
hidden from the world inside their marvelous Monster costumes.
That's right - Bob and Ana are the Monsters! You people are scared
to death of two of the nicest people at the studio!
Personally speaking, although Bob and Ana are so scary they cause me
headaches, I have to begrudgingly admit I admire their endurance.
Some of you know exactly what I am talking about when I say it gets
REALLY HOT inside those costumes, especially after you dance a
little. Most people at least take off their masks for a breath of
fresh air. Not Bob and Ana! They keep those hideous rubber masks on
the entire night. Those masks are hot, they are uncomfortable, they
limit your vision, they itch, and worst of all they make you feel
very claustrophobic. These two have to be miserable inside those
outfits!
And they suffer for what reason? So people can complain about how
ugly and scary they are? Whoa, now that's a big reward! Such a
payoff!
Personally, I am glad they suffer. After you read about their rotten
behavior, you will all agree they deserve an entire night of
Punishment.
Actually Chuck and Spike perform a huge public service at the party.
How would my party ever be successful without some big, ugly
monsters? I mean, think about it. A lot of people come to this
studio looking stunning, sexy, colorful, and beautiful. They breathe
fresh air all night long. And with ugly monsters standing around,
the Beautiful People look even more beautiful! All the Beautiful
People owe a great debt to Ugly People for providing such an obvious
contrast!
So I think Bob and Ana deserve a Prize for their Service to the
Beautiful People. Bob and Ana get my 2008 Ugly Costume Hero award
for this year and for last year as well. Without their suffering,
how could we appreciate true beauty?
Actually, it is kind of ironic that Ana Torres of all people gets
"The Big Ugly" Award. What the world doesn't realize is that inside
her Monster Costume lurks the face of a real beauty! When it comes
to 'inner beauty', someone surely had Ana in mind. That's right, Ana
Torres is not only one of the sweetest ladies I know, she is
knockout pretty!
In my book, a woman this beautiful who spends an entire evening
looking gruesome and repulsive two years in a row marks her as one
heck of a neat girl! So when you see me hugging her as I am wont to
do every time I see her, now you know why I think Ana is so special!
And while I am giving out compliments, Bob is definitely one of the
nicest guys I know as well. He and Ana fit like a glove with their
smiles and warmth.
You might be surprised to learn that despite the fact that I really
both people, Bob and Ana are in BIG TROUBLE with me.
One week ago on Wednesday, January 28, these two characters showed
up for my Ghost Town class wearing Matching Green outfits. Now,
here's the deal. It is obvious the two have a lot of affection for
each other. I don't have a problem with that. But when they wear
Matching Color-Coordinated Outfits, they cross a line. People who
are lonely see how happy they are and how obnoxiously cute they look
together and they get envious. That's right - Bob and Ana are guilty
of flaunting their happiness in front of an entire class (secretly,
I think they are getting back at all of us for not appreciating them
enough when they are ugly.)
So last week I gave them a warning - no more cute color-coordinated
outfits! Knock it off.
Imagine my consternation when they wore the exact same obnoxious
matching green outfits to the studio on Monday, February 2. The
nerve! So I chewed them out again! They deserved to be chewed out!
Excessive cuteness is a serious fashion crime at SSQQ.
I figured two warnings should do it. You would thing a word to the
wise should be sufficient. Wrong! On Wednesday, February 3, Bob and
Ana were in my Ghost Town class. It was a big night. There were over
200 people at the studio that night! 50 of them were in my class.
Fifty people is a lot of people to keep track of. So I was a little
preoccupied.
But then it happened. Twenty minutes into class Bob and Ana made a
big mistake - they stood next to each other. When I saw them wearing
color-coordinated Burgundy outfits, I nearly went ballistic. The
nerve!!! It didn't matter that they both turned Barney-purple with
embarrassment. That ain't gonna get them off the hook. They were TOO
CUTE!! Shame on both of them!
You know, Once is an incident. And Twice is a coincidence. But THREE
TIMES IS DELIBERATE! They are both guilty of deliberately being TOO
CUTE! This burgundy incident was no accident. Trust me. I have been
around too long. I know when people are being deliberately
color-coordinated because I am an expert. I am telling you they did
it ON PURPOSE as a shameful attention-getting device!
And I told Bob and Ana I was going to teach them a lesson and write
them up in the newsletter. Do not feel sorry for them. Do not try to
make them feel better. They are getting what they deserve! This
unacceptable behavior is tantamount to publicly sticking their
tongue out at me! Tsk Tsk!
So let this be a warning to Bob and Ana and any other
color-coordinated couples that this kind of behavior will not be
tolerated at the studio. Knock it off! From now on, cute couples
must wear un-matching outfits or expect to be publicly called out.
It is hard enough to be lonely and see a couple together that is so
obviously happy together. But when they start dress alike, that is
TOO MUCH. And I have to tell you, everyone in that room agreed with
me. Bob and Ana had gone too far. They were TOO CUTE FOR WORDS!
Shame on them. Next time I think I will spank them.
Furthermore they better not come to the 2009 Halloween Party wearing
matching outfits. That will be the absolute last straw.
long. They got teased a lot, but it didn't bother them at all. Their
smiles indicated they absolutely reveled in all the attention given
to them. Caroline especially showed great fondness for that gun. I
heard there was a guy in a moose outfit who ran every time Caroline
came near with her shotgun. Boy, I would loved to have gotten that
picture! "
ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, Bob and Ana had the nerve to come to the
studio wearing MATCHING CANDY-CANE RED AND WHITE SHIRTS!
After all my warnings, can you believe they did that! Bob and Ana
are in SO MUCH TROUBLE!
I don't think we have heard the end of this story.
FYI - a Palindrome is a word spelled forwards and backwards the same
way. Not only do they dress alike, they are probably the only
dancing Palindromes in the world! And it's true! When BOB and ANA
dance backwards, they look the same as when they dance forwards!
..........
THE THREE-YEAR UPDATE ON THE SSQQ SLOW DANCE AND ROMANCE STORY
http://www.ssqq.com/romance/romance2009story.htm
With Valentine's Day rapidly approaching, I am pleased to report
that Slow Dance and Romance is indeed alive and well here at SSQQ.
In 2008, we had 15 Weddings that were either be directly attributed
to SSQQ or that SSQQ played a significant role in creating. This
amazing total was actually just par for the course. Over the past 10
years, I have listed 147 Weddings that SSQQ has been involved in...
and that's just counting the ones I know about. There are plenty
more, believe me.
2009 has already brought us our first SSQQ Wedding. Former SSQQ
Dance Instructor Leo Skiba married his long-time sweetheart Rebecca
Turini in early January 2009. Leo met Rebecca in 2005 when she took
his Beginning Two Step class here at the studio. Leo promises me
plenty of details and a picture!
Furthermore, as I write, there are at least five more SSQQ weddings
right around the corner: Patty Pennington and Guy Hoover, Olga
Bochareva and Luis Castillo, Gerry Francis and Amy Adams, Keith
Patterson and Penny Gunderson, plus Gus Donnell and Fran Zandstra.
We are approaching the three year anniversary of my Matchmaker Story
about the history of the studio's legendary ability to create
positive relationships.
(RICK ARCHER'S NOTE: This story is continued at
http://www.ssqq.com/romance/romance2009story.htm )
AN SSQQ VALENTINE'S SPECIAL
RON MOORE AND KATHLEEN WOOD: A 1999 SSQQ ROMANCE REVISITED
Rick Archer's Note: The SSQQ Web Site came on line at the tail end
of 1998. During the next year, 1999, every time someone got engaged
or married, I listed the story in our Newsletter. Nor did I erase
anything. The information from the entire year was able to
accumulate in one spot.
At the end of 1999, I was trying to organize the Newsletter from 12
separate issues into one page that covered all the events from that
year. During this project, I was surprised to notice all the
marriages. When you announce one or two marriages a month, it isn't
easy to see the big picture. But now I was seeing the Big Picture
loud and clear - SSQQ was one heck of a wedding factory!
You can read the story of this discovery at
http://www.ssqq.com/romance/romance2009story.htm
By coincidence, one of my favorite couples from 1999 were profiled
recently in a very nice story from the February 2009 issue of Fort
Bend Lifestyles and Homes.
Leslie Tenaro, better known as "Eve" from her recent Garden of Eden
Halloween costume, first pointed out the story to me. Then another
person - I have completely forgotten who it was! (please forgive!) -
handed me a copy. And here it is:
LOVE IS IN THE AIR! RON AND KATHLEEN MOORE
Reprinted from Fort Bend Lifestyles and Homes
February 2009
Article written by Beverly Maurice for their Valentine Issue
Who would have thought that a Country Dance lesson would lead to
Paris?
Yet that's the story for attorney Ron Moore and his wife Kathleen.
Ron is an attorney for oil and gas interests and small businesses.
Kathleen is a board member for the Petroleum Club Ladie's Assocation
and a past president.
They met in 1996 when each had enrolled for dance lessons at the
SSQQ Country Dance Studio. That stands for Slow Slow Quick Quick and
the studio taught ballroom lessons too. The lessons came first in
group style, and then each person was to find a partner to practice
with.
"He asked me to dance," said Kathleen, "and I begged off. I was
afraid I hadn't learned the steps very well, and I told him I
probably couldn't do it yet."
But Ron wasn't about to be put off that easily. Here was a pretty
red-head with a sincere smile. Ron convinced her to give it a try.
"Everybody's in that same situation," he said. Ron added,
"Kathleen's actually a good dancer. She even followed when the leads
were bad."
Kathleen was impressed with his determination and the pleasant way
he insisted. So they began meeting for the practice dance sessions
after every class for about three months. Each became the other's
favorite dance partner. Eventually they joined a group of students
who went on to a Country Western bar after classes.
For their first date, Ron took Kathleen to the Houston Ballet.
Getting to know one another, they dated for almost two years. That's
when Ron dreamed up a beautiful proposal.
"We went to New York to see a play," said Ron, "and I took her to
the Rainbow Room for dinner beforehand. I proposed over dinner, and
we looked for the ring later."
They flew to Paris for the wedding and were married in the Gardens
of Luxebourg on the 99th day of the 99th year of the last century.
Their advice on keeping a happy union:
Ron: "Give and take - be happy!"
Kathleen: "Lots of laughter and humor, being there for each other.
We love nature, animals, cultural events, things historical and
dancing at the Petroleum Club."
And with memories of Paris, they like to plan together for their
vacation trips.
(Here is the original SSQQ Newsletter Version of Ron and Kathleen's
story:
www.ssqq.com/newsletter/news1999x05may.htm
Here is Ron and Kathleen's picture:
http://www.ssqq.com/romance/grapevinepics.htm )
RICK ARCHER'S NOTE:
Ron and Kathleen's touching romance is straight out of the SSQQ
Playbook. Although they were in different dance classes, they stuck
around afterwards at Practice Night. That's when Ron first asked
Kathleen to dance.
Pretty soon they were also dancing outside the studio with "THE
GROUP". Eventually Ron and Kathleen began dating, one thing led to
another, and they have been happily married for 10 years.
Newcomers to SSQQ might think this is a unique story, but it isn't.
I have seen this same thing happen time and time again at the
studio.
If I have one suggestion for all of you: STAY FOR PRACTICE NIGHT
Dance class is a good place to notice people, but the sparks always
begin to fly at Practice Night.
..................................
AN ARTICLE ON COURTSHIP RITUALS
By Martha Brockenbrough
from the ENCARTA Newsletter
When I was 20 years old, I spent a few months living on the island
of Crete. The man I worked for told me that back in his courting
days, girls could use bread crusts to signal their interest in boys.
If a girl served a boy a piece of bread and turned the rounded crust
toward him, zing! It meant she was interested.
I asked him if anyone had ever shown him the sad side of the bread.
Yes, he admitted; finding his one true loaf took a few tries.
OK, he said love, not loaf. But the rest is true and I never forgot
-- mainly because at that time in my life, it seemed like such a
better way of navigating the rocky shoals of romance than, you know,
actually talking to someone.
Courtship before milkshakes and trunks
It wasn't just the Cretans who came up with word-free icebreakers,
it turns out. The Evergreen State College historian Stephanie Coontz,
who wrote "Marriage, a History," told me of a charming ritual in
ancient China called "visiting girls."
Boys who wanted a visit, as it were, would play musical instruments
to entertain a group of girls sitting in a circle. When a girl
caught a boy's eye, he would stop in front of her.
Up until this point, the ritual is just like the dance known as "the
snowball" we used to do in the early '80s at my town's
roller-skating rink. But the Chinese tradition was more elegant than
skating to "Morning Train" while the black light and strobes created
a special mood; if the girl fancied the boy, she'd reach beneath her
skirt and pull out ... a stool for him to sit on. (You didn't think
she was going to pull out something else, did you? Tsk.) The boy
might even wrap a shawl around her shoulders, just to keep her warm.
The Chinese also had special courtship songs. If a man saw a woman
he was attracted to, he might sing this:
"The spring breeze reawakens the sleeping grass,
On the mountain slopes bloom all kinds of flowers.
My dear, you are the most exquisite flower,
Nobody can help admiring you ... "
The woman's reply, if she liked him, offered an invitation to her
stilt house for a cup of tea.
This is almost exactly like the Black Eyed Peas song, "My Humps."
Boy: "What you gon' do with all that junk?
All that junk inside your trunk?"
Girl: "I'ma get, get, get, get, you drunk,
Get you love drunk off my hump."
With the exception of the fact that one is poetic and the other
completely crass, and one beverage is tea while the other is
something fermented, it's remarkable how little things have changed
over the centuries.
Bondage and role playing
While all this talk of tea and trunks is cozy, it's perhaps not as
cozy as something called "bundling," a practice that took place in
colonial America, Britain, Holland and Germany.
If a young couple wanted to be married and their parents approved,
they were permitted to share a bed. The girl's nightdress would be
knotted at the bottom. Perhaps unsurprisingly, some teenagers undid
the knots in the pursuit of the naughty. Bundling occasionally led
to bundles of joy about nine months later. Can you imagine a teen
today requesting the privilege?
Somewhat surprisingly, the Puritans had better courtship rituals
than the Communists. In 1952, Moscow Radio featured a hot commie
pickup line, as demonstrated by a boy and girl working side by side
on a collective farm.
The book "The History of Courting" by E. S. Turner says the girl
should say, "How wonderful it is to work on such a beautiful night
under the full moon and do one's utmost to save petrol." Then the
boy replies, "The night inspires me to over-fulfill my quota by a
higher and still higher percentage." I do not believe this is a
euphemism, by the way.
The Burmese Communist courtship protocol of the same era deemed "you
are beautiful" and "I love you" as bourgeois statements, inferior to
such sweet nothings as, "I am deeply impressed by your qualities as
a faithful and energetic member of the Party, and I wish to wage the
Party struggle together with you." Again, not a euphemism, though if
you're into communist role-playing games, I suppose it could be.
Some things will never change
What's likely to be more durable advice, though, comes from the
Roman poet Ovid, born more than 2,000 years ago. He was banished,
perhaps for his potentially tongue-in-cheek advice in "The Art of
Love," which recommends -- among other things -- giving desirable
women many gifts, and even pretending flowers and fruits come from
your own country estates (that would totally work on me).
Also, if she cries, cry with her, even if you have to poke yourself
in the eye to do it. Finally, make sure you don't let her cloak drag
in the dirt. If you carry the edges of it, you might even get to
check out her legs in the process.
His advice isn't just for men, either. Women should keep their teeth
clean, but not while men are watching. They should also learn to
smile in such a way that their missing and rotten teeth don't show.
And they should keep their legs and armpits shaved:
"A stubbled leg your suitor will not charm
And -- dare I warn? -- no goat below the arm."
And so there you have it: Things that have united lovers for
thousands of years. Good luck fulfilling your quotas, my exquisite
flowers.
..............................
UPDATE ON OUR BARCELONA 2009 TRIP: GUESS WHAT PATTY GOT FOR
VALENTINES DAY?
The sublime Patty Harrison, beautiful, blond, talkative, semi-nuts,
got a surprise for Valentine's Day from her honey Joe, aka Mr.
Smile. Patty and Joe are going on the Barcelona Cruise!
I have been sworn to absolute secrecy for weeks, so I am glad that
V-Day is finally here and I can break the story. Cher Longoria was
especially excited to find out there would be another beautiful
blond along on the trip.
That Joe sure makes it hard for the rest of us guys on Valentine's,
doesn't he?
By the way, this trip is shaping up nicely. Despite the horrible
economy, I think a lot of people are keeping an eye on this trip for
the simple reason that this is the one of the most exciting
Destination Cruise Trips we have ever taken. I don't know if any
trip will ever beat Hawaii, but this Barcelona sure has a lot going
for it. Check out the Itinerary:
http://www.ssqq.com/travel/barcelona2009.htm
.............
EXPLORING POTENTIAL FUTURE CRUISE DESTINATIONS PART TWO
(Rick Archer's Note: This was an article sent to me by Alan Fox,
owner of Vacations to Go, a Houston-based Travel Agency that has
grown to be one of the most successful travel agencies in the
country. Alan is a former basketball buddy of mine and good friend.
I published Part One in last week's Newsletter. Here is PART TWO of
Alan's first-hand story of his trip to Antarctica.)
From: VacationsToGo.com
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:39 PM
To: dance@ssqq.com
Subject: Vacations To Go Cruise Newsletter anarctica two
Dear Mr. Archer,
Alan Fox is cruising Antarctica on the Minerva, chartered by Regent
Seven Seas, and his second report follows.
________________________________________
And now there came both mist and snow
And it grew wondrous cold:
And ice, mast-high, came floating by,
As green as emerald.
The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Samuel Taylor Coleridge
________________________________________
I knew when I opened my eyes in our darkened cabin that we had
reached Antarctica--the smooth ride gave it away. Drake Passage was
behind us and would not be a factor again, at least until our return
to Ushuaia.
I fumbled for my watch--5am--and moved quietly to the curtains for a
peak. In latitude, we had survived the Furious Fifties and entered
the Screaming Sixties. This far south, it would be light nearly 24
hours a day, but alas, from the port side, there was only the
Southern Ocean to see.
Ten minutes later, dressed and laden with camera gear, I had the
outside decks of the Minerva entirely to myself as I stood silent,
mesmerized by the soaring white peaks of the South Shetland Islands
and a massive iceberg--taller than our vessel--off our starboard
side.
The sea and the sky were gray, with a temperature in the low 30s (F)
and a brisk breeze that made it feel much colder. Suddenly, in the
distance, a whale spouted, and almost simultaneously I was pelted by
snow, horizontal snow that in five minutes had turned my gloves
white as I fought to hold my camera steady against the wind.
My heart pounding, I was as excited as a child, desperately wanting
to run back inside to scream to my traveling companions to get up,
we're here, but unable to tear my eyes away from the view.
I saw six more whales that morning as the ship came to
life--humpbacks and minkes--giant animals in a giant land.
By the time the Minerva cut her speed and began to approach Penguin
Island, our first landing spot, I had missed breakfast altogether.
Not to worry, in four days at sea I had eaten more than enough to
tide me over.
I booked the Minerva because she is the finest of the ships that put
people ashore in Antarctica. Twice a day for four days we were to
spend 1˝ to 2 hours exploring the shore or in motorized, inflatable
rafts called Zodiacs, cruising through icebergs. Both of today's
excursions were to be shore landings, and our excitement was
palpable.
We met at the appointed place and time, climbed down temporary
stairs on the outside of the ship and were helped into our Zodiacs,
10 guests per raft, along with a driver who was also a skilled
naturalist.
We were bundled in new red parkas provided by the ship, ours to
keep, waterproof pants and boots, gloves, caps and two or three
layers underneath. The right gear is a necessity as every one of
these items made a difference.
Five minutes later, we reached the rocky beach, threw our legs over
the side of the raft and slipped into the ankle-deep water. We were
met by our expedition leader, Suzana, who gave us the lay of the
land, reminded us to stay at least 15 feet from the animals and
birds so as not to disturb them, and warned us to steer clear of
potentially aggressive fur seals that dotted the beach.
It was snowing again but the wind had nearly died as I stepped away
from the group, cleared my head and took in the panorama.
To my left, the rocky beach gave way to water and a distant island
with snow-covered peaks and calving glaciers. Dead ahead, the
Minerva was several hundred yards offshore, and there were three
ship-sized icebergs a mile or more beyond. To my right, not far from
the water, there were fur seals, elephant seals and a Weddell seal,
and in the sky, giant petrels, skuas (penguin-eaters) and Antarctic
terns.
Farther down the beach, the rocky shore led to an elevated plateau
that was covered with hundreds of chinstrap penguins--adults and
chicks--continuously squawking and chirping. I did not have to hike
all the way to the rookery for a close-up view, though, as solos and
groups of two or three or four chinstraps were solemnly marching in
every direction--including mine.
Penguins in Antarctica have no fear of humans and are as curious
about us as we are about them. It seemed almost as if individual
penguins had been assigned to watch each of us.
Several times that day I had to back up as the adorable little
creatures--apparently unaware of the 15-foot rule--waddled right up
to my camera as I knelt to take their pictures.
The exploration of Penguin Island was filled with "firsts" for me,
including the first time I have ever been charged by a yelping fur
seal. I don't know why he took an interest in me--I was giving him a
very wide berth. I wondered if he'd sensed weakness from that meal I
had missed, and resolved not to miss any more.
I had been instructed by Suzana to clap my hands above my head in
such a situation, which is easier said than done while holding a
camera with a foot-long lens. Still, it worked, and there is a
pre-clap photo of this fellow in today's slideshow. It's slightly
out-of-focus as he was backing me into the ocean at the time.
At the rookery, we watched adult chinstraps feeding their young with
regurgitated krill, a shrimp-like creature that is the main food for
whales and seals as well. Chicks are the gray, furry penguins in the
pictures, and they must molt into their black-and-white, waterproof
plumage before the summer ends.
In only a few months, summer will close like a curtain and every
drop of water within sight of this island will be frozen over for
the long, dark winter. Young and old penguins must make their way
far out to sea before that happens.
By the end of the excursion, the sun broke through the clouds and
added color to the landscape. For the first time, I noticed an
extinct volcano on nearby King George Island, and I was
flabbergasted to hear that its red cone is called Deacon Peak.
Five thousand miles away, on that very same morning, the Deacons of
Wake Forest University (my alma mater) had been elevated to the No.
1 position in men's basketball. It occurred to me that I was the
only Deacon looking at Deacon Peak as the Deacons peaked.
Clearly, lack of food had begun to affect my mind.
We returned to the ship and remedied that situation with a hearty
lunch of grilled German sausages on the aft deck. The bright sun
turned the morning's gray water to near-tropical blues and greens.
With the ship's band playing and a whale breaching off our stern,
the Minerva set sail for our next destination. We'd packed an awful
lot into our first half day in Shangri-La, but we were only
beginning.
Alan Fox...somewhere in Antarctica
....................
AND THAT'S A WRAP FOR FEBRUARY 2009 ISSUE 3.
THIS ISSUE WAS 15 PAGES LONG WHICH MAKES IT 16 PAGES SHORTER THAN
LAST WEEK.
TRILLIONS OF ELECTRONS HAVE BEEN DESTROYED IN THE CREATION OF THIS
ISSUE. TOUGH.
THANKS FOR READING!
|
|